• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB NIMBUS 3 / DFS3; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB NIMBUS 3 / DFS3; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE Back to Search Results
Model Number 151028
Device Problem Sparking (2595)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/28/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being filed under exemption (b)(4) by arjohuntleigh (b)(4) sp.Z o.O.(registration #3007420694) on behalf of the importer (b)(4).Please note that previous medwatch reports for this product may have been submitted for the manufacturing site (b)(4).From 2014 and going forward complaints related to these products are to be handled by arjohuntleigh ab's complaint handling establishment and any medwatch reports will be submitted under registration #3007420694.Additional information will be provided upon the investigation conclusion.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2016 arjohuntleigh has become aware of an event with the involvement of nimbus 3 system.It was reported by the customer that a pump power cord was severed (exposing an internal isolation) which resulted in sparks on the cable.It is unknown whether the sparks were observed during patient's therapy.No injuries resulted from this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Please note that previous medwatch reports for this product may have been submitted for the manufacturing site arjohuntleigh, a branch of (b)(4).From 2014 and going forward complaints related to these products are to be handled by arjohuntleigh (b)(4) complaint handling establishment and any medwatch reports will be submitted under (b)(4).An investigation was carried out into this complaint.Following the information reported, it was indicated that nimbus 3 pump power cord has been severed and sparks were seen.No injuries to patient resulted from this event.Device was sent to the workshop due to a damaged cord.The pump was inspected and cable insulation cut was detected.After service and electrical test, cord was removed and replaced.Based on the performed interview no injury to patient or caregiver occurred.Moreover, the annual service was performed as its planned date has passed.When reviewing similar reportable events on nimbus system, we have found 2 other cases presenting a similar scenario as claimed in this complaint.The occurrence rate observed for this failure mode is currently considered to be very low.Following the information gathered, personnel probably noticed the malfunction when trying to relocate the bed.It is highly possible that the act of cable damage have occurred during attempt to move the bed (e.G.Damaged by bed castors) or when personnel tried to raise side safety frames, which resulted in the reported symptom.The positioning of the power cable was most likely applied incorrectly.It may be suspected that a defective power cable was not withdrawn from use in a timely manner which have caused sparks.General safety warnings included in instructions for use (document id 151996en_05): "make sure that the mains power cable and tubeset or air hoses are positioned to avoid causing trip or other hazard and are clear of moving bed mechanism or other possible entrapment areas." this possible sequence of events presented above seems to be the most probable and in line with the event description.It was found that the event was most likely caused by use error - not following the ifu guidelines and warnings.Arjohuntleigh suggests to remind the staff involved of the device labeling, with a special attention paid towards a careful device handling and maintenance.This is to be communicated to the customer.Due to the nature of this incident we are reporting this event to competent authorities in the abundance of caution - even though no serious injury occurred, there was a probability of harm with a high severity.It has not been established that the nimbus 3 system was used for patient therapy at the time of the event.Based on the above, the pump was found to have malfunctioned (not performing up to the specification) when the event took place, however, it was concluded that the use error has contributed to the reported event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NIMBUS 3 / DFS3
Type of Device
MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB
arjohuntleigh house
houghton hall business park
houghton regis, bedfordshire LU5 5 XF
UK  LU5 5XF
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB
arjohuntleigh house
houghton hall business park
houghton regis, bedfordshire LU5 5 XF
UK   LU5 5XF
Manufacturer Contact
kinga stolinska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki, 62-05-2
PL   62-052
698 282 46
MDR Report Key6206124
MDR Text Key63383295
Report Number3007420694-2016-00264
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other Caregivers
Device Model Number151028
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/25/2017
Distributor Facility Aware Date11/28/2016
Device Age8 YR
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer01/25/2017
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/28/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/27/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/25/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/08/2008
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-