• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PHILOS II SLR; PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PHILOS II SLR; PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number 341822
Device Problems Failure to Interrogate (1332); Pacing Problem (1439)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/23/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Ous mdr - shortly after the implantation, when the pocket was closed, no pacing was recorded, but impedance measurements were in range, and the device could not be interrogated.It was decided to replace the device.The pacemaker was not returned to biotronik.No adverse patient side effects have been reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The pacemaker was received for analysis.In agreement with the clinical observation, the pacemaker was neither interrogatable nor was any output signal present.Efforts to reset the pacemaker using a technical programming tool were partly successful.A warning message was triggered subsequently indicating a severely invalid memory content.Further attempts to reset the device were unsuccessful.Therefore the pacemaker was opened to perform a hardware reset.After the reset a normal interrogation was properly feasible.The memory content of the device was not restorable due to the hardware reset.Therefore, the origin of the invalid memory content is unknown.The pacemaker was subsequently subjected to an electrical analysis.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.In addition, a long-term storage test at different temperature environments were performed.No deviations were noted during the analysis, in particular the memory content remained valid.The quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this pacemaker were re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.Particularly the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.The memory content during the production at biotronik was valid.In conclusion, the clinical observation was confirmed.The analysis revealed an invalid memory content leading to the clinical observation.After a hardware reset the device proved to be fully functional.Despite exhaustive attempts the failure condition was not reproducible.The root cause for the invalid memory content was therefore not determinable, however, it cannot be excluded that strong electromagnetic fields during the implantation might have contributed to the clinical event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PHILOS II SLR
Type of Device
PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin D-123 59
GM  D-12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key6213860
MDR Text Key63559446
Report Number1028232-2016-05066
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NVZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P950037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/08/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number341822
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/08/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/29/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/04/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/23/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-