• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC. VERSA-KATH CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC. VERSA-KATH CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number A-EP-042
Device Problems Difficult To Position (1467); Difficult to Remove (1528); Retraction Problem (1536); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 12/06/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
On december 6, 2016, epimed received a call from (b)(6), reporting an incident involving a sheared versa-kath catheter.The catheter was returned to epimed on december 9, 2016.During examination, it was evident the catheter's fep outer coating had sheared near the distal end.The pet inner coating and the internal catheter spring remained intact.However, the internal spring was stretched and uncoiled.The catheter's coating was sheared approximately 2.5" from the catheter's distal end.The piece of coating was not returned to epimed.The catheter was closely examined under the ce-180 (ram opitcal measurement system).During this examination, it was discovered that the direction of the coating shear was from the proximal end of the catheter tracking towards the catheter's distal end.This is indicative of an attempt to remove the catheter while the catheter was either still "lodged" within the patient and/or while the needle was still positioned within the patient; i.E.The catheter may have become caught on the needle's heel of the bevel/tip during catheter withdrawal.During the description of the event, dr.(b)(6) stated that the catheter had been "inserted into s1 (l5-s1 lumbosacral joint), snagged in scar tissue, and the internal spring became uncoiled." dr.(b)(6) stated he did not withdraw on the catheter while the needle was still in place.However, the manner in which the catheter's coating was sheared is indicative of the catheter's coating becoming cut while being retracted against a sharp external force.Dr.(b)(6) stated that he was confident that the catheter coating that had sheard off during the procedure (due to being snagged) and had been left inside the patient.Dr.(b)(6) stated he would notify the patient of the findings and continue to observe the patient for any adverse reactions related to the incident.Epimed suspects that the catheter became caught on the needle's heel of the bevel/tip, possibly during an attempt to reposition or inadvertent retraction by the physician.Epimed warns against this in their ifu pi-004 rev.3.Epimed believes if the ifu was followed, it may have prevented the damage to the catheter in question.
 
Event Description
On december 6, 2016, (b)(6) radiology technician, (b)(6), contacted epimed's quality assurance department on behalf of dr.(b)(6); reporting that during a procedure, the catheter was inserted into s1, snagged in scar tissue, and the internal spring became uncoiled.The procedure was eventually completed successfully.The account requested notification if any of the catheter material was determined missing during epimed's investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERSA-KATH CATHETER
Type of Device
VERSA-KATH CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC.
141 sal landrio drive
johnstown NY 12095
Manufacturer (Section G)
EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC.
141 sal landrio drive
johnstown NY 12095
Manufacturer Contact
kris knapp
141 sal landrio drive
johnstown, NY 12095
5187250209
MDR Report Key6230625
MDR Text Key64133171
Report Number1316297-2016-00021
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K023140
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Medical Technologist
Remedial Action Replace
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/06/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/31/2021
Device Model NumberA-EP-042
Device Catalogue Number156-2112
Device Lot Number11127443
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/09/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/09/2016
Initial Date FDA Received01/06/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/17/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-