• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PERFUSION SYSTEMS DLP AORTIC ROOT ANTEGRADE ANTEGRADE CANNULA WITH VENT LINE; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PERFUSION SYSTEMS DLP AORTIC ROOT ANTEGRADE ANTEGRADE CANNULA WITH VENT LINE; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number 20014
Device Problem Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem Aortic Dissection (2491)
Event Date 12/19/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic's investigation is in progress.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that as the customer was cutting the suture to remove this aortic root vent cannula, the suture would not cut as expected.The customer applied more pressure than normal against the blue flange tip on the cannula in an attempt to cut the suture and noted the suture lodged in a small gap between the cannula body and the blue flange.The customer then cut the suture to release the device from the vessel.Once removed, a small tear was noticed in the aorta that the customer suggested was likely due to the excessive force against the device during the attempt to cut the suture.The tear was repaired.There was no further injury to the patient.The product is expected to return to medtronic for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality assurance laboratory, visual inspection identified a space between the cannula body and the blue flange tip.Medtronic's investigation is in progress.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality assurance laboratory, visual inspection identified a 0.016 inch gap between the cannula body and the blue flange tip.Medtronic's investigation is in progress.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: analysis confirmed the gap between the cannula body and blue flange.No similar occurrences have been identified at this time.Medtronic will continue to monitor for similar occurrences.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DLP AORTIC ROOT ANTEGRADE ANTEGRADE CANNULA WITH VENT LINE
Type of Device
CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key6250719
MDR Text Key64881777
Report Number2184009-2017-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWF
UDI-Device Identifier20613994495543
UDI-Public20613994495543
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K810548
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2019
Device Model Number20014
Device Catalogue Number20014
Device Lot Number2016090203
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/20/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/19/2016
Initial Date FDA Received01/13/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
02/23/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/01/2017
02/01/2017
03/16/2017
09/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/26/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-