• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER GMBH B-S REINFORCEMENT CAGE HIP IMPLANT; HIP PROSTHESIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZIMMER GMBH B-S REINFORCEMENT CAGE HIP IMPLANT; HIP PROSTHESIS Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem Injury (2348)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was discovered that the legal manufacturer of the reported product is zimmer (b)(4).The initial report was submitted under mfr report number 0001822565-2016-04449 by zimmer inc., (b)(4).All available information is covered in the report at hand.As the case at hand was taken from a journal article it is not suspected that the device or additional information is being submitted for review.A technical investigation was not possible to perform, as the devices were not at hand for investigation.However, based on the available information the investigation is conducted with outcome as follows.Device history records (dhr) review results: as no lot numbers were provided for the devices, the device history records could not be reviewed.An e-mail requesting missing device data information was sent on december 16, 2016.At zimmer (b)(4) all medical devices prior release to market undergo several quality inspections as defined in our quality procedures.Our quality inspection- and deviation procedures ensure that only products fulfilling the specification are sold.These procedures are part of the overall quality management system at zimmer (b)(4) and get regularly audited by our notified body, competent authorities and internal and external auditors.Thus, for all products sold to the market can be assumed having a complete and correct dhr.Trend analysis: a trend analysis could not be performed as no item number was available.Event summary: it was reported that patient 13 experienced radiolucency and lateral migration, 2.9 mm at 5 years.Aaos score was iii, paprosky score 2c and harris hip score 53,56,471,2 5 years respectively.Review of received data no medical data such as x-rays, surgical notes or any other case-relevant documents received devices analysis no product was returned to zimmer biomet for in-depth analysis.Review of product documentation no product documentation was reviewed for investigation.Root cause determination using dfmea - aseptic loosening, migration of implant due to insufficient secondary stability due to surface structure.- not possible, a systematic issue with design and/or material properties would have been detected as part of complaint trending defined in complaint registration or in the current pms process post market surveillance.- impingement with stem (decreased rom), dislocation, subluxation,migration of implant,stress shielding due to malpositioning of the implant, wrong alignment.- possible, as no x-rays were provided.- migration of implant due to wrong selection of component sizes, planning, operation technique and use of instruments.- possible as no x-rays were provided.Conclusion summary neither x-rays, operative notes, nor office visit notes were received for a deep assessment.Patient factors that may affect the performance of the components such as bone quality, activity level, type of activity (low impact vs.High impact), relevant medical history and adherence to rehabilitation protocol are unknown.Due to significant lack of information, it is impossible to perform a meaningful analysis of the reported event.Based on the information available for the investigation, an exact root cause could not be determined.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer (b)(4) considers this case as closed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported in a journal article, that a patient experienced radiolucency and lateral migration, 2.9 mm at 5 years.Aaos score was iii, paprosky score 2c and harris hip score 53,56,47 at 1,2 5 years respectively.(a.J.Van koeveringe, p.E.Ochsner: revision cup arthroplasty using burch-schneider anti-protrusio cage.In: international orthopaedics (2002) 26:291-295.).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
B-S REINFORCEMENT CAGE HIP IMPLANT
Type of Device
HIP PROSTHESIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZIMMER GMBH
sulzer allee 8
sulzer industrie park
winterthur 8404
SZ  8404
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZIMMER GMBH
sulzer allee 8
sulzer industrie park
winterthur 8404
SZ   8404
Manufacturer Contact
kevin escapule
1800 west center street
warsaw, IN 46580
8006136131
MDR Report Key6266002
MDR Text Key65354081
Report Number0009613350-2017-00083
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/03/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberN/A
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/17/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/20/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age77 YR
-
-