• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS HEALTHCARE ALLURA XPER FD10 C; SYSTEM, X-RAY, ANGIOGRAPHIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS HEALTHCARE ALLURA XPER FD10 C; SYSTEM, X-RAY, ANGIOGRAPHIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 722001
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Aneurysm (1708); Hair Loss (1877)
Event Date 12/06/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still ongoing on this event.When the investigation is completed a follow-up will sent to the fda.
 
Event Description
Philips received a complaint from the customer in which was stated that a patient suffered from hair loss after an emergency aneurysm.The patient had 3 studies in 2 weeks which resulted in an accumulated dose of 6.5 gy.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Philips investigated this complaint and came to the following conclusion: a philips field service engineer (fse) came onsite and was informed by the customer that the study was extensive with 60 cine runs on the same spot of the patients head.The fse troubleshot the system and found that the fda limit rule of 10 r/min edl limit was set on "false" in the examination programmed x-ray (epx), which was requested by the customer.He found that the entrance dose limitation (edl) calibration was going up to 20 r/min as a result.It is allowed in argentina to set the fda limit rule of 10 r/min edl limit on "false" in the epx.The fse performed a level 1 image quality (iq) check which showed that only the edl limit failed because the level 1 iq check does not accept and edl limit of 20 r/min.The system passed the level 1 iq check after the fse changed the epx settings to set the system to the fda limit rule of 10 r/min and recalibrated the system.The fse returned the system back to the customer in working order.The philips complaint investigator and the system designer collected an reviewed all available evidence and learned that the patient was treated three times in two weeks time, but no dose reports could be provided for the other two treatments.We could not find any evidence that the system did not function correctly.The fact that the system was set to 20 r/min did not increase the dose received by the patient since the dose control loop controls the amount of radiation output to the optimal dose value.The radiation output will only go above 10 r/min with very large patients, which is not the case for the patient of the reported issue ((b)(6)).The event log file did not indicate any dose related system malfunction.The dose (total air kerma) of 6.5 gy received by the patient is not unusual with the reported circumstances taken into account.The amount of dose received by the patient can lead to hair loss, especially when all of the dose enters one spot on the patients head.Also the fact that this patient was treated 3 times within 2 weeks makes the chance on hair loss bigger for this patient.Conclusion: we could not find any evidence that the system did not function correctly.The hair loss experienced by the patient is a possible side effect of the procedures, when looking at the dose given to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALLURA XPER FD10 C
Type of Device
SYSTEM, X-RAY, ANGIOGRAPHIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS HEALTHCARE
veenpluis 4-6
p.o. box 10.000
best 5680 DA
NL  5680 DA
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
dusty leppert
veenpluis 4-6
p.o. box 10.000
best 5680 -DA
NL   5680 DA
MDR Report Key6266032
MDR Text Key65356432
Report Number3003768277-2017-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IZI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAR
PMA/PMN Number
K041949
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/30/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number722001
Device Catalogue Number722001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/30/2016
Initial Date FDA Received01/20/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/04/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/15/2004
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age32 YR
Patient Weight80
-
-