Additional information received on february 5, 2017: procedure performed - total ankle arthroplasty.Surgeon is not sure if the fracture is a result of a failure of the device, he believes is more likely related to implantation, rather than the device itself.Surgeon anticipate functional problems due to this incident, patient underwent fixation of fracture due to displacement and now has a surgical wound dehiscence.Treatment plan after fracture fixation is with wound issue, plan for irrigation and debridement in one week.Patient was following postoperative instructions.The product will remain implanted.Integra has completed their internal investigation on february 1st 2017.The investigation included: methods: review of device history records.Review of complaints history.Results: the cadence corner osteotome was not returned for investigation.Per information provided by the manager of global medical affairs, based on his conversation with the surgeon, the corner osteotome was difficult to remove.As a result, the doctor engaged in what he called ¿wiggling¿ of the osteotome in order to facilitate its removal.He appeared to indicate that this may have been the precipitating event.Dhr review; a review of the lot record did not show any indications of problems that could have caused or contributed to the complaint.Complaint rate: total # complaints = 3.Number of procedure = 161 procedures as of january 31, 2017.Complaint rate = 3/161*100 = 1.9%.A possible root cause was identified as the design of the corner osteotome, part number 10204078.This device is included in the 1.0 set, which is being replaced by part number 10204079 in the 1.1 set.
|