• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC EQUINOXE ANATOMIC REPLICATOR PLATE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC EQUINOXE ANATOMIC REPLICATOR PLATE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 300-10-45
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Metal Shedding Debris (1804); Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Patient Problems Joint Disorder (2373); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/11/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pending engineering evaluation.
 
Event Description
Revision due to aseptic loosening/ failure of ingrowth on the stem.Metal debris noted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint products were returned for analysis.The condition was confirmed.Visual evaluation condition/findings (conducted with a 7x or 10x optical) the replicator plate was returned attached to the humeral stem.The markings around the circumference of the replicator plate appear consistent with the disengaged humeral head positioning on the replicator plate taper.The scratches on the inside surface of the retrieved humeral head appear consistent with positioning against the replicator plate taper following the disassociation of the humeral head.The scratches and deformities on the edges of the replicator plate appear consistent with the use of a metal tool to insert the torque screw.X-ray review: the patient had a follow-up every 3 months for a year and a half, following their shoulder arthroplasty.In the 12-month ap x-ray the taper disengagement is visible.It was likely that the humeral head taper was never engaged on the replicator plate due to boney impingement or taper contamination/taper being wet.There appears to be lateral bone up to the humeral head, which may have prevented the humeral head taper from fully engaging.The frequency of occurrence ranking scale is very low; therefore, this does not appear to be design-related.The company is not aware of receiving any other complaint reports involving another part from these manufacturing lots of 15 (humeral stem), 28 (humeral head) and 50 (replicator plate) pieces that have been in the field since 2015, 2013, 2014, respectively.Therefore, this issue does not appear to be manufacturing related.The humeral loosening reported was likely the result of the humeral head taper never being engaged on the replicator plate at the time of initial surgery, due to either boney impingement or taper contamination/taper being wet.In a review of the labeling it is known that device specific risks consist of: fracture, migration, loosening, subluxation, or dislocation of the prothesis or any of its components, any of which may require a second surgical intervention or revision.As part of the preoperative assessment, the surgeon must ensure that no biological, biomechanical, or other factors exist that might adversely affect the surgery and/or postoperative period.Revisions or surgical interventions are a known complication found in joint replacements.All patients should be instructed on the limitations of the prosthesis, the patient should be cautioned to monitor activities and protect the replaced joint from unreasonable stresses and follow the written instructions of the physician with respect to follow-up care and treatment.Possible detachment of the coating(s) on the components, potentially leading to increased debris particles.This device is used for treatment, not diagnosis.No information has been provided.Asked, not answered.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient had a right shoulder revision.Initial surgery date not provided.There has been no additional information provided about the patient or event.This is one of three products involved with the reported event and the associated manufacturer report numbers are 1038671-2017-00042, 1038671-2017-00043 and 1038671-2017-00044.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EQUINOXE ANATOMIC REPLICATOR PLATE
Type of Device
REPLICATOR PLATE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC
2320 nw 66th ct
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC
2320 nw 66th ct
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
kate jacobson
2320 nw 66th court
gainesville, FL 32653
3523771140
MDR Report Key6289289
MDR Text Key66445062
Report Number1038671-2017-00044
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K042021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/11/2017,05/22/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date05/06/2019
Device Catalogue Number300-10-45
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/18/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer01/11/2017
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/11/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/31/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/21/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/23/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/08/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-