• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS P 612 PRE-ANALYTICAL SYSTEM; AUTOMATED PREANALYTICAL SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS P 612 PRE-ANALYTICAL SYSTEM; AUTOMATED PREANALYTICAL SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number P612
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/21/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer complained of questionable results on multiple tests performed on one patient sample aliquotted by a cobas p612 pre-analytical system and tested on a cobas 8000 analyzer.Of the results provided for eight tests, four were erroneous and reported outside the laboratory.Initial tests were run on the aliquot from the p612 on the cobas 8000 with serial number (b)(4).Repeat tests were run on the primary tube on the cobas 8000 with serial number (b)(4).A corrected report was issued.The sample was retested because the doctor questioned the initial sodium result from the aliquot.The initial sodium result was 117 mmol/l with a data flag.The analyzer reran the test with the same result.It was reported outside the laboratory.The repeat on the primary tube was 144 mmol/l.The initial potassium was 3.3 mmol/l with a repeat of 4.3 mmol/l.The initial chloride was 80 mmol/l with a repeat of 100 mmol/l.The initial calcium was 9.2 mg/dl with a repeat of 7.3 mg/dl.The customer repeated the sodium on the aliquot sample on analyzer (b)(4) (the analyzer on which the primary tube had been run) on (b)(6) 2017.The results were 119 mmol/l and 120 mmol/l, both with data flags, demonstrating the result on the aliquot was repeatable on a second analyzer.The patient was not adversely affected.The lot numbers of the reagents and electrodes involved were requested but not provided.The field service representative (fsr) could not find a cause for the event.He checked the p612 for leaks and proper alignments.All were good both before and after his actions.He found wear on a syringe and replaced it as a precaution.Operational and mechanical checks passed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation determined that, since the difference in results between the primary tube and the aliquot were constant, the issue was due to a dilution of the aliquot.Additional data were requested for the investigation but were not available.The investigation was unable to determine a root cause with the information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site was corrected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBAS P 612 PRE-ANALYTICAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
AUTOMATED PREANALYTICAL SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key6326162
MDR Text Key67335630
Report Number1823260-2017-00297
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JQP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Medical Technologist
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberP612
Device Catalogue Number05082579001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/24/2017
Initial Date FDA Received02/13/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
01/24/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/28/2017
12/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-