• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. CARTO® 3 SYSTEM; COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. CARTO® 3 SYSTEM; COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number M-4800-01
Device Problem Device Alarm System (1012)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/25/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The hardware investigation has begun but it has not been completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a carto 3 system.At the beginning of the procedure and after inserting the catheters, a map shift without error message on the carto 3 system was noted after attempting to utilize the univu feature.The lasso catheter was approximately 2cm out of range.The physician had images of the siemens system and based on the anatomical structure and placement of the catheters he could corroborate the correct catheter position.The procedure was completed with no patient consequence.There was no patient movement or cardioversion that took place prior to map shift.Therefore, this event has been assessed as a reportable malfunction as such map shifts without an error message could potentially be caused by a system malfunction, and there would be a potential risk to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a carto 3 system.At the beginning of the procedure and after inserting the catheters, a map shift without error message on the carto 3 system was noted after attempting to utilize the univu feature.The lasso catheter was approximately 2 cm out of range.Issue was related to user error work flow.The mismatch described on the complaint occurred because of a specific workaround where no map was build but the segmented volume was used.This sensitive workflow can have mismatch issues due to location pad movement and wrongly placed segmented volume on rotational angiography.The system was tested and was found functioning correctly and ready for use.It was explained to the customer that the system is tested and working according to the system specification and this issue was not duplicated in the next cases.The device history record (dhr) review was performed by the manufacturer and no anomalies, which are related to the reported issue, were noted in manufacturing or servicing of this equipment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARTO® 3 SYSTEM
Type of Device
COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD.
4 hatnufah street
yokneam 20667 17
IS  2066717
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD.
4 hatnufah street
yokneam 20667 17
IS   2066717
Manufacturer Contact
joaquin kurz
33 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
9497893837
MDR Report Key6331628
MDR Text Key67851917
Report Number3008203003-2017-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBE
PMA/PMN Number
K133916
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM-4800-01
Device Catalogue NumberFG540000
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/25/2017
Initial Date FDA Received02/15/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/04/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-