• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number M00545000
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was used during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure.According to the complainant, the brush ¿went¿ broke during the procedure.There were no known patient complications reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation results: visual evaluation of the returned device revealed that the pull wire was found to be broken at the distal end and the bristled portion of the brush was not present and was not returned for evaluation.The proximal end of the extrusion was bent and cut by the customer which caused the pull wire to be exposed.Functional analysis showed that the handle was actuated, however, the brush failed to extend.The device handle was disassembled and it was found that the pull wire was broken at the hypotube joint.Due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure; performance of the device was limited.Therefore, the most probable root cause classification for the reported failure is operational context.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and no deviations were found.A search of the complaint database revealed that no other complaints exist for the specified lot.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was used during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure.According to the complainant, the brush ¿went¿ broke during the procedure.There were no known patient complications reported as a result of this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key6363283
MDR Text Key68468178
Report Number3005099803-2017-00481
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
K930348
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/03/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2018
Device Model NumberM00545000
Device Catalogue Number4500
Device Lot Number19921050
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/22/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/03/2017
Initial Date FDA Received02/27/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/03/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/07/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-