• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CASHEL 466P306X; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CASHEL 466P306X; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 466P306X
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Respiratory Distress (2045)
Event Date 01/31/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for inspection.Manufacturing records (dhr) could not be performed as the product catalog and lot number were not available.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt. .
 
Event Description
As reported by the legal team, the plaintiff underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to including, but not limited to, severe and constant chest pains and compromised respiratory system.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the plaintiff suffered serious injuries and damages and will require extensive medical care and treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported by the legal team, plaintiff underwent placement of the trapease vena cava filter on or about (b)(6) 2006.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to including, but not limited to, severe and constant chest pains and compromised respiratory system.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the plaintiff suffered serious injuries and damages and will require extensive medical care and treatment. the device was not returned for analysis. a device history record (dhr) review could not be conducted as the sterile lot number was not provided.  the trapease filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated. the purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.As per the instructions for use (ifu), implantation of the trapease filter is contraindicated in patients with uncontrolled infectious disease.There are possible patient and pharmacological factors that may have contributed to the reported events of severe and constant chest pains and shortness of breath.Based on the minimal information provided, it is not possible to draw a clinical conclusion or determine a root cause for the reported events.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported event is related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days of this report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
After further review of additional information received the following sections have been updated accordingly.As reported, the patient underwent placement of the trapease inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on or about (b)(6) 2006.Per the patient profile form (ppf), the device was implanted due to a history of deep vein thrombosis (dvt.) the patient is reported to have tolerated the index procedure well.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to including, but not limited to, severe and constant chest pains and compromised respiratory system.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered serious injuries and damages and will require extensive medical care and treatment.The ppf indicates that there was an attempted retrieval of the device although there have been no known documented attempts.The patient is reported to have experienced shortness of breath and continues to experience anxiety related to the device.The filter remains implanted; thus, unavailable for analysis.The product was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Without procedural films for review, the reported embedded in ivc wall and retrieval difficulty could not be confirmed and the exact cause could not be determined.The trapease device is not indicated for retrieval.Usage of the product other than that indicated in the product's ifu may involve additional risks not described in the labeling.The predominant concern is the development of endothelialization, which would make subsequent removal difficult.Endothelialization has been shown to lead to explantation problems after as short a period as 12 days.Chest pain, respiratory disorders and anxiety do not represent device malfunctions.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient comorbidities, pharmacological and lesion characteristics.Without procedural films or images for review the reported event(s) could not be confirmed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
466P306X
Type of Device
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CASHEL
cahir road
cashel, co. tipperary
miami FL
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CASHEL
cahir road
cashel, co. tipperary
miami FL
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60th ave.
miami lakes, FL 33014
MDR Report Key6367849
MDR Text Key68748856
Report Number1016427-2017-00202
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020316
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/23/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2008
Device Model Number466P306X
Device Catalogue Number466P306AU
Device Lot NumberR1005664
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date01/31/2017
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/31/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/01/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
12/07/2017
01/19/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/16/2017
01/07/2018
01/23/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/25/2005
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age38 YR
-
-