• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN MFG SOLUTIONS S.A. PALINDROME; CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, IMPLANTED, COATED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN MFG SOLUTIONS S.A. PALINDROME; CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, IMPLANTED, COATED Back to Search Results
Model Number 8888145045P
Device Problems Material Fragmentation (1261); Product Quality Problem (1506)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 02/09/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Submit date: 03/02/2017.An investigation is currently underway; upon completion the results will be forwarded.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported to covidien on 02/10/2017 that a customer had an issue with a dialysis catheter.The customer states the interventionalist (ir) was placing a palindrome dialysis catheter that resulted in the ir having to retrieve the pull-apart sheath out of the right internal jugular.When the dr.Broke the sides of the pull-apart sheath and started peeling it away, it fell and was not retrievable.The ir dr.Had to snare it out through the groin.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A device history record (dhr) review was performed for the lot.No discrepancies that may have contributed to a complaint of this nature were found.The quality inspection of final visual and physical evaluation results indicated that the product met specification requirements.The sample consisted of a pull apart sheath dilator.This component was returned inside a plastic bag with its respective polybag and showed signs of use.Visual inspection was performed and it was observed that the tubing was separated from the upper part of the valved sheath.Additionally, it was observed that the tubing of the sheath look intact.In order to replicate the reported condition, another pull apart was used, and after the use an excessive force the tubing was separated from the upper part of the valved sheath.Visual inspection of the tubing revealed that the holes were completely broken.The manufacturing plant requested samples of dilators with the same lot number as the product with the reported issue.One box with five kits was received and each one of the kits were opened to review the integrity of the pull apart.The visual inspection revealed that the pull apart sheaths did not present visual issues.The five pull aparts were submitted to visual, physical, dimensional (sheath peel force) and functional (guidewire test) inspection based on the specification for that part.All samples passed the tests.The overall molding condition of the pull apart was found acceptable.An ishikawa diagram was used to determine the potential causes for this event and possible causes were identified.This reported condition has been confirmed.Based on all gathered information, the most probable root cause for this event can be considered as supplier related.During sample evaluation it was determined that even though the sample returned presented signs of use, the tubing was separated at the upper part of the valved sheath with no evidence of excessive force since the holes of the sheath looked intact.This event can be considered as an isolated event.As this is a purchased component, a supplier corrective action request (scar) is being issued to handle the supplier investigation per procedure.No complaint triggers or trends were identified.Based, on the required action decision tree, this complaint is considered as a fast track event since it is reportable and was confirmed as device (supplier) related.It must be noted that in-process controls, such as personnel training, incoming quality acceptance testing for raw material, 100% in process visual inspection and visual acceptance sampling, are in place to prevent nonconforming product from leaving the manufacturing operations.This complaint will be used for tracking and trending purposes.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The customer states the interventionalist (ir) was placing a palindrome dialysis catheter that resulted in the ir having to retrieve the pull-apart sheath out of the right internal jugular.When the dr.Broke the sides of the pull-apart sheath and started peeling it away, it fell and was not retrievable.The ir dr.Had to snare it out through the groin.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PALINDROME
Type of Device
CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, IMPLANTED, COATED
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN MFG SOLUTIONS S.A.
edificio b20, calle #2
alajuela 0101
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN MFG SOLUTIONS S.A.
edificio b20, calle #2
alajuela 0101
Manufacturer Contact
edward almeida
15 hampshire street
mansfield, MA 02048
5084524151
MDR Report Key6371601
MDR Text Key68768411
Report Number3009211636-2017-05019
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NYU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/22/2018
Device Model Number8888145045P
Device Catalogue Number8888145045P
Device Lot Number1529500145
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/21/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/10/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/02/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/17/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/22/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-