• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH OMNIFIT M/S PSL SHELL 54MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH OMNIFIT M/S PSL SHELL 54MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 2017-0054
Device Problems Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371); Mechanical Problem (1384); Peeled/Delaminated (1454); Mechanical Jam (2983); Positioning Problem (3009)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Injury (2348)
Event Date 02/09/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
Revised the omnifit cup due to loosening.X-ray taken prior to revision showed beads peeling from the cap.During the revision procedure surgeon changed the cup and plate.Completed the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: catalog #.An event regarding alleged "loosening of the shell" involving a omnifit m/s psl shell 54mm was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: a material analysis was performed and concluded that "no indications of bone in-growth was observed on the beaded side of the acetabular shell, however the regions where beads were missing could not be evaluated.Impingement was observed on the insert as well as a region of sub-surface delamination and cracking.It is likely that this region occurred due to the loading conditions created from the impingement and contact between the rim of the insert and the femoral head.Dislodged beads from the omnifit shell became imbedded in the insert.The adhered material, scratching and markings seen on the metal head came from the beads dislodged from the omnifit shell.The exact cause of the beads coming off the shell could not be determined.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined." -medical records received and evaluation: a review of the undated x-rays and material analysis report by the consulting clinician indicated "no clinical or past medical history, no patient demographics, no primary or revision operative reports, and no dates of surgery are available.The event was apparently revision for acetabular loosening and bead dehiscence noted from an acetabular shell with beads imbedded in the insert.X-ray printouts include three undated ap x-rays of the left hip demonstrating a left total hip arthroplasty with broken trochanteric reattachment wires, a loose vertical psl acetabular component with multiple fine radiodensities in the acetabular zone iii consistent with metallic beads.A material analysis report dated (b)(6) 2017 of a 52 omnifit m/s psl shell, a poly liner and a metal head include eight photographs of the explanted components, two sem images of the zone of the acetabular shell with beads next to a region with lost beads, one sem of the insert with imbedded titanium beads, one eds graph of the adherent metal on the head, one eds graph of the base material of the bead material in the shell, and one eds graph of the bead material on the insert.The conclusions of this report are: no bone ingrowth was observed in beaded site of the acetabular shell; impingement observed on the insert and region of the subsurface delamination and cracking likely due to contact between the rim of the insert and the femoral head; dislodged beads from the omnifit shell were imbedded in the insert; the adherent material on the head came from the beads; the cause of the beads coming off the shell could not be determined; and no material or manufacturing defects were observed.Based upon the information available for review, no determination can be made regarding the cause of this clinical situation." -device history review: a review of the device history records could not be performed as no lot information was provided.-complaint history review: a complaint history review could not be performed as no lot information was provided.Conclusions: a review of the undated x-rays and material analysis report by the consulting clinician indicated "no clinical or past medical history, no patient demographics, no primary or revision operative reports, and no dates of surgery are available.The event was apparently revision for acetabular loosening and bead dehiscence noted from an acetabular shell with beads imbedded in the insert.X-ray printouts include three undated ap x-rays of the left hip demonstrating a left total hip arthroplasty with broken trochanteric reattachment wires, a loose vertical psl acetabular component with multiple fine radiodensities in the acetabular zone iii consistent with metallic beads.A material analysis report dated (b)(6) 2017 of a 52 omnifit m/s psl shell, a poly liner and a metal head include eight photographs of the explanted components, two sem images of the zone of the acetabular shell with beads next to a region with lost beads, one sem of the insert with imbedded titanium beads, one eds graph of the adherent metal on the head, one eds graph of the base material of the bead material in the shell, and one eds graph of the bead material on the insert.The conclusions of this report are: no bone ingrowth was observed in beaded site of the acetabular shell; impingement observed on the insert and region of the subsurface delamination and cracking likely due to contact between the rim of the insert and the femoral head; dislodged beads from the omnifit shell were imbedded in the insert; the adherent material on the head came from the beads; the cause of the beads coming off the shell could not be determined; and no material or manufacturing defects were observed.Based upon the information available for review, no determination can be made regarding the cause of this clinical situation." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Revised the omnifit cup due to loosening.X-ray taken prior to revision showed beads peeling from the cap.During the revision procedure surgeon changed the cup and plate.Completed the procedure.Event update based on review of the medical records by consulting clinician dated (b)(6) 2017: x-ray printouts include three undated ap x-rays of the left hip demonstrating a left total hip arthroplasty with broken trochanteric reattachment wires, a loose vertical psl acetabular component with multiple fine radiodensities in the acetabular zone iii consistent with metallic beads.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OMNIFIT M/S PSL SHELL 54MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
cindy chuhinko
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key6385570
MDR Text Key69301591
Report Number0002249697-2017-00825
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K903636
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number2017-0054
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/07/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/09/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/07/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/24/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-