• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SEPTODONT INC. HENRY SCHEIN MULTI-USE DISPENSER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SEPTODONT INC. HENRY SCHEIN MULTI-USE DISPENSER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number FPSCHEIN-175
Device Problem Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/18/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation ongoing.
 
Event Description
(b)(4).Initial information received by dealer on 19-dec-2016 and additional information was received by dealer on 28-dec-2016.Both initial and additional information were sent to (b)(4) on 28-dec-2016.Case 1 of 2.Linked with local reference # (b)(4)(same reporting dental clinic, same device, same reported concern).The 2 cases concern 2 different identified patients: a (b)(6) female patient and a (b)(6) male patient.However it could not be determined which of these two patients was concerned by the following reported information.On (b)(6) 2016, while dental clinic staff (b)(6) was placing the resin on the back tooth.The suspect dispenser henry schein multi-use dispenser (lot # not available) snaps and makes a very loud noise.Nobody was hurt or injured but the potential for the car pule to be swallowed was very high.No lot # available.Additional narrative received on 06-feb-2017: a unidose resin capsule was placed in the suspect multiuse dispenser and the dentist was squeezing the resin into the mouth as usual.The suspect device "popped" the very moment the device handle was squeezed.When asked which part of the suspect multiuse dispenser was broken, it is indicated by the complainant it was at "the silver thing at the tip of the gun [suspect multiuse dispenser] when you put the unidose resin", "the hard outer shell broke" and it made such a loud noise it seemed like an actual gun was fired.According to the complainant, the reported breakage had already happened to 3 different multiuse dispensers.Additional information received on 07-feb-2017: it was confirmed by the complainant that the previous two multiuse dispensers "broke in the exact same way.While dispersing the resin capsule in the mouth.We are very luck none of the pieces went down the patient at mouth".On 08-feb-2017, it was determined by (b)(4) that the reported malfunction failed to perform as intended and that the suspect device is likely to cause or contribute to a serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.On 21-feb-2017, (b)(4) contacted supplier of the a "other number" on the returned device sample was identified as "i6802", which permit septodont to determine device manufacturing date as 09-jul-2014.Call log was received from qa on current investigation status.Causality assessment on 10-mar-2017 by al on initial information received on 02-feb-2017, and additional information received on 06-feb-2017, 07-feb-2017, 08-feb-2017 and 21-feb-2017: seriousness: serious (determined by (b)(4) that the reported malfunction failed to perform as intended and that the suspect device is likely to cause or contribute to a serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.) listedness/expectedness: device breakage: unlisted eu; unexpected us/ca.No adverse event: listed eu; expected us/ca.Causality: latency - unknown; recognized association - no; analysis - the reporter had 2 similar events of device breakage in 2 identified patients.The device was returned to quality department only for one of them.Breakage of the device could be due to anomaly of the material, however call log received from qa on current investigation status stated that the returned dispenser appeared to be dropped, and that it was heavily used due to buildup on the pin.Therefore, without other information, since no adverse event was reported and considering state of use of the device, the causality between the dispenser and device breakage was assessed as unlikely.The event no adverse event was not assessable; dechallenge - na; rechallenge - na.Concluded causality who: unlikely for device breakage, not assessable for no adverse event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HENRY SCHEIN MULTI-USE DISPENSER
Type of Device
MULTI-USE DISPENSER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SEPTODONT INC.
418s taylor ave.
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer Contact
lawrence kass
416 south taylor ave.
louisville, CO 80027
3036657535
MDR Report Key6395374
MDR Text Key70058518
Report Number0001721729-2017-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EIY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/10/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Dentist
Device Catalogue NumberFPSCHEIN-175
Device Lot NumberI6802
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/16/2017
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/28/2016
Initial Date FDA Received03/10/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured07/09/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
-
-