• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Unable to Obtain Readings (1516)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/10/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacture representative (rep) regarding a patient's implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.Rep reported getting "???" on c1, c2, and c3.When the rep increased/decreased amplitude and pulse width (pw), the "???" would clear but then the remaining combinations would be greater than 4000 ohms.Rep states ins is in the pocket and they are just closing the patient now.There was no trouble inserting the lead.An impedance test was performed at 2.0v and 360 pw.Technical services specialist (tss) had rep run impedances at 2.5v and 120 pw.The "???" was cleared, but then everything else was greater than 4000 ohms.Tss had rep run at 2.0v, 360 pw.C1 and c3 had "???", c0 was around 3500 ohms, c-2 was around 900 ohms, and bipolar pairs were 1700-3600 ohms.The ins was being used for testing motor response.Rep states they did testing intra-op and it was great, patient's trial was good as well.Tss reviewed impedances may need time to normalize as they had good results with trial and intra-op response testing.Tss reviewed issue with measurement circuitry which may be causing issue with unipolar pair "???" and that this isn't an issue with the system itself (and they most likely won't use case in programming).No patient symptoms reported.No further patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the rep indicated that the patient had already been seen for follow-up before they had made it to the office.The symptoms were well controlled.There were no future office visits scheduled, so they were unable to check the impedance.The cause of the impedance errors were not determined.The rep attempted multiple changes of pw and amplitude at the initial check with and without the assistance of technical services.The information was confirmed and reviewed with the healthcare provider.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6403751
MDR Text Key69946782
Report Number3004209178-2017-05571
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2017
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/10/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/14/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
03/20/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/21/2017
10/17/2017
Date Device Manufactured04/09/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age66 YR
Patient Weight100
-
-