• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS HEALTHCARE ALLURA XPER FD10; SYSTEM, X-RAY, ANGIOGRAPHIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS HEALTHCARE ALLURA XPER FD10; SYSTEM, X-RAY, ANGIOGRAPHIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 722003
Device Problem Failure to Power Up (1476)
Patient Problems Ventricular Fibrillation (2130); Ventricular Tachycardia (2132)
Event Date 02/18/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
When the investigation has been completed philips will inform the fda.
 
Event Description
Philips received a complaint from the customer in which it was stated that: the patient was brought to the cath lab emergently from the er for a code crimson (stemi).Physician stepped on fluoroscopy pedal and the fluoroscopy did not turn on.The team rebooted the equipment which did not correct the problem.Patient became unstable developed ventricular tachycardia (vt) / ventricular fibrillation (vf)and was shocked several times.Patient was transferred to cath lab 1.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Philips investigated this complaint and came to the following conclusion: a philips system designer and a philips generator engineer concluded that the error was caused by opened spring contacts of the safety resistors.Both specialists were unable to identify the cause for the opened spring contacts.No parts of the generator were found to be defective, only the spring contacts of the safety resistors were opened.The resistors are needed to limit the inrush current to the velara generator (charge of the capacitors in the intermediate voltage circuit of the converters) and to prevent for a overcurrent damage of the generator.When the safety resistors are tripped, x-ray generation is no longer possible.This issue was most likely caused by an external factor and not by a malfunction of the system.They suspect an asymmetry in the mains to be the cause of the blown safety resistors.The system was in an active state for a long time (no standby request was sent to the system interface).When the generator stays for a long time in an active state, and there is an asymmetry in the mains value, it is possible that the spring contacts of the safety resistors can blow.Philips is unable to determine if the delay in procedure due to the malfunction of the system, contributed to the decrease in ejection fraction for the patient.The outcome of the initial risk assessment showed that the risk of harm for this issue is within acceptable limits.Trend data for this failure mode shows a stable failure rate in the last 5 years.This delay of treatment is within all risk limits.The field service engineer replaced the safety resistors, which solved the issue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALLURA XPER FD10
Type of Device
SYSTEM, X-RAY, ANGIOGRAPHIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS HEALTHCARE
veenpluis 4-6
p.o. box 10.000
best 5680 DA
NL  5680 DA
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
dusty leppert
veenpluis 4-6
p.o. box 10.000
best 5680 -DA
NL   5680 DA
MDR Report Key6406410
MDR Text Key70005107
Report Number3003768277-2017-00031
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IZI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K041949
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/18/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number722003
Device Catalogue Number722003
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/18/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/15/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/18/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/24/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient Weight85
-
-