• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLFLEX ENTERAL DUODENAL STENT WITH ANCHOR LOCK DELIVERY SYSTEM, MOD M00565010; STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLFLEX ENTERAL DUODENAL STENT WITH ANCHOR LOCK DELIVERY SYSTEM, MOD M00565010; STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK476
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Death (1802)
Event Date 11/21/2016
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
The mean age of patients included in the study was 70.5 years (range 63-81 years).The study included 62 patients: 35 males and 27 females.The specific upns and lot numbers were not reported; therefore, the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.Literature source: rademacher, christoph, et al."self-expanding metal stents for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis." world journal of gastroenterology 22.43 (2016): 9554.Doi http://dx.Doi.Org/10.3748/wjg.V22.I43.9554 the devices have not been received for analysis; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint devices could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
Boston scientific corporation became aware of multiple events through the article "self-expanding metal stents for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis" written by christoph rademacher, et al.According to the literature, the aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of self-expanding metal stents (sems) for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (goo) in patients with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis (pc).In all cases, patients underwent stent implantation with an uncovered wallflex duodenal stent between january 2008 and april 2014.62 patients were included in the study.The etiology of the patients¿ goo included pancreatic cancer (n = 29), gastric cancer (n = 14), biliary cancer (n = 9), cancer of the ampulla of vater (n = 3), and other causes (n = 7).27 of the patients had pc, and 35 did not.Clinical success was defined as an improvement in obstructive symptoms and discharge from the hospital without needing parenteral nutrition.The article reported that clinical success was achieved in 49 patients and clinical failure of the stent placement was associated with shorter survival.60 of the 62 patients died during follow-up.Those that were effectively palliated exhibited a median survival of 75 days.Those that experienced clinical failure survived a median of 14.5 days.The article did not provide any further information regarding these patients.If any additional information is received, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event or problem has been updated with additional information received on march 21, 2017.
 
Event Description
Boston scientific corporation became aware of multiple events through the article "self-expanding metal stents for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis" written by christoph rademacher, et al.According to the literature, the aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of self-expanding metal stents (sems) for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (goo) in patients with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis (pc).In all cases, patients underwent stent implantation with an uncovered wallflex duodenal stent between january 2008 and april 2014.Sixty-two (62) patients were included in the study.The etiology of the patients¿ goo included pancreatic cancer (n = 29), gastric cancer (n = 14), biliary cancer (n = 9), cancer of the ampulla of vater (n = 3), and other causes (n = 7).27 of the patients had pc, and 35 did not.Clinical success was defined as an improvement in obstructive symptoms and discharge from the hospital without needing parenteral nutrition.The article reported that clinical success was achieved in 49 patients and clinical failure of the stent placement was associated with shorter survival.60 of the 62 patients died during follow-up.Those that were effectively palliated exhibited a median survival of 75 days.Those that experienced clinical failure survived a median of 14.5 days.***additional information received on march 21, 2017: according to the corresponding author, none of the deaths mentioned in the article were related to the stent.All patient deaths were due to tumor progression.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WALLFLEX ENTERAL DUODENAL STENT WITH ANCHOR LOCK DELIVERY SYSTEM, MOD M00565010
Type of Device
STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key6411816
MDR Text Key70170343
Report Number3005099803-2017-00768
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K062750
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/20/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK476
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/20/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/16/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
-
-