BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (HEREDIA) ROTAWIRE¿ AND WIRECLIP¿ TORQUER; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number H802228240022 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
|
Patient Problem
Perforation of Vessels (2135)
|
Event Date 02/23/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Same case as mdr ids: 2134265-2017-02255 and 2134265-2017-02256.It was reported that a wire tip was detached and vessel perforation occurred.The target lesion was located in the severely tortuous and severely calcified mid to proximal right coronary artery (rca).A 330cm rotawire¿ , 1.75mm and 1.25mm rotalink¿ plus were selected for use.During the procedure, the physician used the 1.75mm rotaburr first.After that, a smaller size of 1.25mm burr was used.Ablation was performed 4 times at 200,000rpm with a duration of 20 seconds.During removal of the device, it was noted that the wire became detached, migrated to the patient's blood vessel and could not be retrieved.It was alleged that although there was wire separation when removing the 1.25mm burr, there is a possibility that wire separation occurred when using the 1.75mm burr.Furthermore, it was noted that with the two points where the wire became detached, no wire perforation occurred at the distal side.However, perforation occurred in the wire tip proximal side.Eventually, the procedure was shifted to surgery.The detached wire tip was retrieved which was longer than the usual and the devices were removed out from the patient¿s body.No further patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the returned device confirmed broken at 314cm from proximal section and it is kinked in several sections.The sections broken returned include the distal section kinked with the spring tip attached and, one piece of wire.Dimensional inspection was done and the overall length could not be measured due to device condition.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Same case as mdr ids: 2134265-2017-02255 and 2134265-2017-02256.It was reported that a wire tip was detached and vessel perforation occurred.The target lesion was located in the severely tortuous and severely calcified mid to proximal right coronary artery (rca).A 330cm rotawire¿, 1.75mm and 1.25mm rotalink¿ plus were selected for use.During the procedure, the physician used the 1.75mm rotaburr first.After that, a smaller size of 1.25mm burr was used.Ablation was performed 4 times at 200,000rpm with a duration of 20 seconds.During removal of the device, it was noted that the wire became detached, migrated to the patient's blood vessel and could not be retrieved.It was alleged that although there was wire separation when removing the 1.25mm burr, there is a possibility that wire separation occurred when using the 1.75mm burr.Furthermore, it was noted that with the two points where the wire became detached, no wire perforation occurred at the distal side.However, perforation occurred in the wire tip proximal side.Eventually, the procedure was shifted to surgery.The detached wire tip was retrieved which was longer than the usual and the devices were removed out from the patient¿s body.No further patient complications were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|