Though no medical/surgical intervention was required to preclude a serious injury in this event, there have been previously reported events involving a similar device that resulted in the need for medical/surgical intervention to preclude permanent damage to a body structure or permanent impairment of a body function.Therefore, this event meets the criteria for reportability per 21 cfr part 803.As received, the handpiece could support the reported complaint however, a root cause could not be determined.Production and quality testing of the handpiece was not performed as the device came in missing a cartridge with the exception of one bearing.Score marks and some debris were observed inside the head cavity.Cap exhibited some scratches/tool marks on its surface.Cap cavity looked good with only minor debris.The retainer exhibited significant horizontal wear.Debris was observed within the returned outer race.Bearing failure could have increased vibration and instability within the head cavity causing the cap to unscrew.Due to the cap turning itself in both directions may have cause wear on the head threads.There is a possibility that the thread issue was a manufacturing error but a review of the dhr documents for the lots before and after as well as this lot did not show any issues, therefore we assume that the head thread being out of specification was due to the cap unscrewing during use.
|