• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA PRIMUS; ANESTHESIA UNITS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA PRIMUS; ANESTHESIA UNITS Back to Search Results
Device Problems Decrease in Pressure (1490); Sticking (1597)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/13/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation was started but is not yet concluded.The investigation result will be reported in a follow up-report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the expiration valve stuck during a case.The pressure graph appeared trapezoid and the pressure fell slower than expected during expiration.Due to this symptom the staff decided to cancel the case.Only one of two surgical treatments was completed at that time.The second one was postponed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
After the reported event, the affected device was checked by a draeger service technician who also downloaded the electronic log file.Based on the information logged therein the case in question was started on (b)(6), at 2:42p.M.Until 3:10p.M., ventilation was stable in both volume- and pressure controlled modes with a constant peep of 5mbar.From 3:10p.M., the peep value increased to 8mbar.Although this may have been the result of user settings, this is rather the timeframe when the reported problems occurred.Within his device check, our service technician was able to reproduce the reported slow pressure decrease during expiration and determined that it was due to a sporadically sticking peep valve.During further inspection of the breathing system neither moisture nor any other contamination could be found, which could have restricted the function of the peep valve.The problem could be solved by re-assembling the peep valve assembly according to the latest draeger instructions which ensure that the diaphragm of the peep valve is mounted free of tension.Thus it was concluded that the reported event was due to unwanted tension within the peep valve diaphragm, which can result from an unfavorable assembly of the peep valve.In this context draeger introduced improved assembly instructions end of 2012.The affected device has already been repaired accordingly.The amount of similar cases is significantly below the values that provide basis for our risk management.Consequently, no further actions are required at this time.
 
Event Description
Please see initial-report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRIMUS
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA UNITS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM  23542
Manufacturer Contact
sonja hillmer
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
4518822868
MDR Report Key6430903
MDR Text Key70741974
Report Number9611500-2017-00083
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CBK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K042607
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/31/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/01/2000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/15/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/24/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/31/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2009
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-