• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 8; DXE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 8; DXE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CAT8XTORQ115
Device Problems Kinked (1339); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/03/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2017-00511, 3005168196-2017-00512.The hospital disposed of the device.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the right common femoral vein using indigo system separator 8 (sep8) and indigo system aspiration catheter 8 (cat8) devices.During the procedure, while in use with a cat8, the distal tip of the sep8 became lodged in the chronic, organized clot in the target vessel.While the sep8 was being retracted, the soft wire distal to the bulb stretched.The physician did not mention resistance but the sep8 tip could be seen buckling against the thrombus.The sep8 was removed and the physician continued the procedure using a new sep8.While removing the new sep8 after completing a pass, the bulb of the sep8 was pulled off the wire and remained within the rotating hemostasis valve (rhv).The physician did not mention resistance while removing the sep8.The cat8 was then removed to be flushed.While an angiogram was being performed, the nurse was looping the cat8 to store on the trolley and inadvertently kinked the cat8 at the mid-shaft.Therefore, the procedure was completed using a combination of direct aspiration as well as a selection of wires to agitate the thrombus through a new cat8.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 8
Type of Device
DXE
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key6449637
MDR Text Key71470462
Report Number3005168196-2017-00513
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00814548016290
UDI-Public00814548016290
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K160533
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/03/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Nurse
Device Expiration Date10/11/2019
Device Catalogue NumberCAT8XTORQ115
Device Lot NumberF71999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/03/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/31/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/11/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age50 YR
-
-