• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG VERTEX RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEM; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG VERTEX RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEM; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number G6956432
Device Problem Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 03/08/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Neither the device nor films of applicable imaging studies were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2011, patient underwent an unknown surgery.On (b)(6) 2017, patient presented with pre-op diagnosis: recurrence of cervical spinal disc herniation.For which patient's fixation range was extended after fixation at levels c6/7.Reportedly, intra-op, during revision surgery, pedicle screws inserted using o-arm and navi deviated.Also, biceps reaction was only 20 % during and immediately after the surgery but it is unknown if it happened due to the screw deviation.The surgeon placed a double spine firmly on c4/5 spinous process.The procedure was performed in this order (c5 left, c4 left, c5 right and c4 right).Creating pilot holes seemed difficult and the surgeon tried it over and over.The surgeon felt something wrong because the double spine also deviated (but why the double spine deviated was unknown at that point).After pedicle screw's insertion, o-arm image revealed that three out of four screws deviated.The surgeon remembered the order of insertion and there was no problem with the c5 left screw so it was judged that pedicle screws started deviating after the c5 left screw insertion.The double spine was confirmed and it was found to be loosened at this point.The surgeon tightened the double spine firmly and images were taken by o-arm again then pedicle screws were reinserted.Surgeon considers that biceps reaction fell because of worsening foraminal stenosis when the screw was inserted, rather than because of the screws deviation.Replacement and reinsertion of screws were performed as a result of this event.There was a delay of more than 60 min in overall procedure time as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERTEX RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG
barrio marianna rd 909, km0.4
humacao PR 00792
Manufacturer (Section G)
MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG
barrio marianna rd 909, km0.4
humacao PR 00792
Manufacturer Contact
greg anglin
1800 pyramid place
memphis, TN 38132
9013963133
MDR Report Key6452498
MDR Text Key71461171
Report Number1030489-2017-00722
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberG6956432
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/08/2017
Initial Date FDA Received04/02/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/08/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/02/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient Weight81
-
-