• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem Death (1802)
Event Date 03/01/2017
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A follow up report will be send upon conclusion.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the user facility that a patient underwent a ureteral stent removal procedure.A (b)(6) male patient with a septic stone had a filiform double pigtail ureteral stent in place for approximately three months.The physician was removing the stent in order to remove the stone.The patient had been in icu for an extended time.When the attending physician tried to remove the stent, it would break off piece by piece.The complete removal of the stent took about one hour.The patient eventually expired and the physician believes if the removal of the stent had not taken so long the patient may have survived.There were no unintended sections of the device that remained inside of the patient¿s body.No further information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Reportable event type is death.The date of patient's death has not been provided.Multiple requests for additional information and the autopsy report have been made.These requests remain unanswered.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The filiform double pigtail ureteral stent was not expected or returned for an evaluation.Additionally, no photographs were provided.An autopsy report has been requested but has not been received.Without the actual device, an evaluation could not be performed and a definitive root cause of the stent separation cannot identified at this time.A review of production and quality documentation did not identify any specific issues with current manufacturing or quality controls that may have contributed to this incident.A review of the device history record showed there were no non-conformances identified during the manufacturing process that would have caused or contributed to the reported product issue.A review of complaint history for this product/lot number combination revealed that this is the only complaint received.Measures have been initiated to address this failure mode.A review of the instructions for use (ifu) noted the following precaution: "improper handling can seriously weaken the stent.Acute bending or overstressing during placement may result in subsequent separation of the stent at the point of stress after a prolonged indwelling period.Angulation of the wire guide or stent should be avoided.Use of a 0-degrees scope lens is recommended.Scope larger than 21.0 french are suggested.Individual variations of interaction between stents and the urinary system are unpredictable." cook medical will notify the appropriate personnel and continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key6459889
MDR Text Key71701497
Report Number1820334-2017-00637
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002151444
UDI-Public(01)00827002151444(17)190810(10)7185646
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number133622
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/07/2017
Initial Date FDA Received04/05/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/19/2017
09/06/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/03/2017
09/07/2017
Date Device Manufactured08/10/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Required Intervention;
Patient Age95 YR
-
-