• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE HEATWRAPS MULTI-PURPOSE MUSCLE PAIN; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE HEATWRAPS MULTI-PURPOSE MUSCLE PAIN; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT Back to Search Results
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Material Disintegration (1177); Material Separation (1562); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Erythema (1840); Rash (2033); Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 03/03/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term] damage to her skin [skin disorder]; the backing came away separately, leaving the adhesive side still stuck to her leg/wrap disintegrated during use/had to literally scrape the adhesive off my skin [device adhesion issue]; left red marks on leg [erythema]; there is still discoloration weeks later [skin discolouration]; the adhesive has left a rash on her leg 5 days later [rash].Case narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer.A female patient of an unspecified age and ethnicity started to use thermacare heatwrap (thermacare heatwraps multi-purpose muscle pain) from an unspecified date daily for a pulled muscle.The patient's medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient reported the adhesive tabs disintegrated, falling apart during use, and left red marks and a rash on her leg where the adhesive had been.The backing came away separately, leaving the adhesive side still stuck to her leg and it had to be peeled off in little pieces like sunburn.She stated she literally had to scrape the adhesive off her skin.There is still discoloration weeks later.The patient mentioned she used the heatwrap as directed.She was concerned the faulty product has done damage to her skin in some way.Action taken with the suspect product was unknown.Clinical outcome of the events was not resolved.Additional information has been requested and will be provided as it becomes available.Follow-up (31mar2017): new information received from a contactable consumer via us fda with regulatory authority report number: (report number: mw5068571) includes: suspect product indication, reaction data (additional events of erythema and skin discoloration), event onset date and event outcome.Us fda considered this case as serious for 'serious injury'.Case upgraded to serious and reportable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass came apart/separated/torn (excludes damaged cells).The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being package.Reasonably suggest device malfunction: yes.Severity of harm: s1.Site sample status was not received.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term].Damage to her skin [skin disorder], the backing came away separately, leaving the adhesive side still stuck to her leg/wrap disintegrated during use/had to literally scrape the adhesive off my skin [device adhesion issue], left red marks on leg [erythema], there is still discoloration weeks later [skin discolouration], the adhesive has left a rash on her leg 5 days later [rash].Narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer.A female patient of an unspecified age and ethnicity started to use thermacare heatwrap (thermacare heatwraps multi-purpose muscle pain) from an unspecified date daily for a pulled muscle.The patient's medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient reported the adhesive tabs disintegrated, falling apart during use, and left red marks and a rash on her leg where the adhesive had been.The backing came away separately, leaving the adhesive side still stuck to her leg and it had to be peeled off in little pieces like sunburn.She stated she literally had to scrape the adhesive off her skin.There is still discoloration weeks later.The patient mentioned she used the heatwrap as directed.She was concerned the faulty product has done damage to her skin in some way.Action taken with the suspect product was unknown.Clinical outcome of the events was not resolved.Product investigation results were as follows: conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass came apart/separated/torn (excludes damaged cells).The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being package.Reasonably suggest device malfunction: yes.Severity of harm: s1.Site sample status was not received.Follow-up (31mar2017): new information received from a contactable consumer via us fda with regulatory authority report number: (report number: mw5068571) includes: suspect product indication, reaction data (additional events of erythema and skin discoloration), event onset date and event outcome.Us fda considered this case as serious for 'serious injury'.Case upgraded to serious and reportable.Follow-up (20may2017): follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (21jul2020): new information received from a product quality complaint group includes product investigation results.Follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMACARE HEATWRAPS MULTI-PURPOSE MUSCLE PAIN
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE
1231 wyandotte drive
albany GA 31705
MDR Report Key6473108
MDR Text Key72176414
Report Number1066015-2017-00074
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K953442
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/03/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received04/07/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/24/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-