Model Number A-EP-089 |
Device Problems
Retraction Problem (1536); Human Factors Issue (2948); Device Handling Problem (3265)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 03/01/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
On (b)(6) 2017, dr.(b)(6), physician at (b)(6), reported that he had a broken catheter.No other information was provided by the account.On march 30, 2017, the product arrived at (b)(4) facility for examination.The reporting account returned approximately 16.5cm of the catheter.This fragment was from the distal end of the catheter tracking 16.5cm towards the catheter's proximal end.The shear appeared to track slightly from the catheter's proximal end to the catheter's distal end.This is indicative of the account retracting the catheter while the needle was still in place.On april 6, (b)(4) emailed (b)(4), their (b)(4) sales consultant, in an attempt to gain more information regarding the reported event.As of april 10, no additional information had been provided.The complaint report stated that no patient information is provided by doctors or nurses in (b)(4) due to privacy data protection laws.Based on the portion of the catheter that was returned to (b)(4) , it is believed that none of the catheter was retained within the patient.Batch history records were reviewed for any anomalies within the lot; however, none were found.(b)(4) will continue to follow up with (b)(4) in order to gain additional information.This report will be updated once new information becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2017, dr.(b)(6), physician at (b)(6), reported that he had a broken catheter.No other information was provided by the account.On march 30, 2017, the product arrived at (b)(4) facility for examination.The reporting account returned approximately 16.5cm of the catheter.This fragment was from the distal end of the catheter tracking 16.5cm towards the catheter's proximal end.The shear appeared to track slightly from the catheter's proximal end to the catheter's distal end.This is indicative of the account retracting the catheter while the needle was still in place.On april 6, (b)(4) emailed (b)(4), their (b)(4) sales consultant, in an attempt to gain more information regarding the reported event.As of april 10, no additional information had been provided.The complaint report stated that no patient information is provided by doctors or nurses in (b)(4) due to privacy data protection laws.Based on the portion of the catheter that was returned to (b)(4) , it is believed that none of the catheter was retained within the patient.Batch history records were reviewed for any anomalies within the lot; however, none were found.(b)(4) will continue to follow up with (b)(4) in order to gain additional information.This report will be updated once new information becomes available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Epimed sent a second email to the account representative on april 24, 2017, in an effort to acquire additional information regarding the reported complaint.The account representative responded on april 25, 2017, stating that there was no new information to report from the account in question.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|