The patient was supported by an extracorporeal circulatory support device (ecmo).A system fault alarm occurred, and the pump speed reportedly dropped to zero.It was reported that the unit ¿stopped working¿, and the speed read --- the flow read 0.0 lpm, and the read out below said ¿system failure¿.The cannulas, lines, power cords, and pump placement were checked.The console was power cycled, and device operation continued.The patient had no blood flow and decreased blood pressure for 2-3 minutes.The unit worked properly after restarting.The hospital clinicians were unable to wake the patient, and the patient had decreased neurological response.The patient was off sedation for approximately 24 hours.The console continued to operate the device as expected; however, during the transfer of the patient to the transport stretcher, it was reported that the exact same system failure happened with all the steps repeated above.During this second episode, the console would not restart, and continued to read ¿system failure¿.The console was exchanged to a backup console.It was reported that the exchange took 3-4 minutes, with no blood flow and decreased blood pressure.The hospital clinicians were unable to wake the patient, and the patient had decreased neurological response.The patient was off sedation for approximately 24 hours.No further additional was provided.
|
The motor is not a single use device.Approximate age of the device is 8 years and 7 months; calculated from the manufacture date of the motor device analysis: the motor and primary console were returned for analysis.The primary console was inspected for external damage and no damage was observed.The primary console was connected to the returned motor and the devices were functionally tested together using laboratory equipment.No fault was initially observed; however, when the motor cable was manipulated during the testing, the reported ¿system fault¿ was able to be reproduced.Bending of the motor cable during testing caused the motor to intermittently produce a short circuit from motor phase ¿a¿ to the chassis/ground outer shield of the cable.The investigation could not determine a point in time when the intermittent short circuit on the motor cable occurred; however a possible root cause for the short circuit could have been aging and/or mechanical stress during handling.The motor has been in use in the field for 8 years, 7 months.A review of the device history record revealed no deviations from manufacturing or quality assurance specifications.No further information is available.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
|