• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER; CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER; CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING Back to Search Results
Model Number D-1343-01-S
Device Problems Material Frayed (1262); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/24/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation with a lasso nav variable eco catheter where the catheter became frayed while inside the patient¿s body.During the procedure, while attempting to move the catheter from the left superior pulmonary vein to the left inferior pulmonary vein, the physician encountered resistance between the catheter and sheath.Slowly, the catheter was removed from the patient¿s body, and it was found to have frayed.The catheter was replaced, and the case continued without any patient consequences.Sheath information is unknown.No damage was observed at the distal end of the catheter upon withdrawal.The resistance between the catheter and sheath is a known occurrence, and in the event that it is encountered, the sheath and catheter can be withdrawn as a unit.This is a common practice during these types of procedures, and the vast majority of electrophysiology procedures utilize multiple device changes.The potential for patient injury is remote, and this is not an mdr reportable event.However, the fraying of the catheter exposes the patient to the internal catheter components, presenting a critical risk of thrombus.As a result, this event is mdr reportable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On 5/5/2017, biosense webster received a device for this complaint file with a lot number different than what was initially reported.Follow ups were performed, and on 6/14/2017, it was determined that the lot number of the returned device (17606753l) is the correct lot number.As a result, the lot/manufacturing/expiry date fields have been updated.The bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation with a lasso nav variable eco catheter where the catheter became frayed while inside the patient¿s body.The returned device was visually inspected, and one of the rings was found damaged.Foreign material was also present.Per these conditions, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ft-ir) analysis was performed.The foreign material was found to have a biological composition, presumably human tissue; the same absorption bands where observed when the foreign material was compared to the reference spectrum of human tissue.The catheter outer diameters were measured and found within specification.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.During the manufacturing process, all catheters are inspected for visual damage prior to packaging.On-line inspections and functional tests are in place to prevent catheters with this type of damage from leaving the facility.The customer complaint has been verified.The root cause of the ring damage cannot be determined, but the root cause of the foreign material could potentially be related to the procedure.However, this cannot be conclusively determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX  32599
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
joaquin kurz
33 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
9497893837
MDR Report Key6494534
MDR Text Key73024650
Report Number9673241-2017-00281
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K113213
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/30/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2019
Device Model NumberD-1343-01-S
Device Catalogue NumberD134301
Device Lot Number17611407L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/05/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/28/2017
Initial Date FDA Received04/14/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
03/28/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/23/2017
07/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/02/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-