On (b)(6) 2016, interventional radiology placed a nephroureteral stent with an "[invalid]".On (b)(6) 2016 the patient underwent a left ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy in the operating room.The nephroureteral stent was removed.The "[invalid]" was not removed as the urologist was not aware there was an "[invalid]" attached to the stent and the md did not see an "[invalid]" ureteral stent was placed.The second stent was removed in the clinic in (b)(6) 2016.Post procedure the patient became symptomatic with hematuria, infection, micro-hematuria, pressure in his kidney area, and occasional left flank pain.The patient was treated with antibiotics and exams were done such as kub and ct of abdominal organs, kidney, ureter, and bladder.On (b)(6) 2016 the patient saw urologist #2.A ct urogram of the abdomen and pelvis with and without contrast was ordered.Results revealed: a thin contiguous linear opacity extending from the lower calyces of the left kidney to the mid/distal ureter felt to be latrogenic in etiology, possibly reflecting suture material related to prior intervention.On (b)(6) 2016 the patient underwent a cystoscopy, left ureteroscopy with removal foreign body [nylon "[invalid"], and placement of left ureteral stent.
|