• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THERAKOS, INC CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THERAKOS, INC CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number NOT APPLICABLE
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problems High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension (1908); Toxicity (2333)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The system was used for treatment.The instrument's serial number was not provided in the article; therefore, the device history review could not be conducted.Trends were reviewed for complaint categories, equipment performance, hypertension, and other adverse event: citrate toxicity.No trends were detected for these complaint categories.From a device perspective: as it is unknown why these patients required blood products, the device cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor in this event.This case will be reported as an mdr out of an abundance of caution.Since this event is associated with the treatment, this mdr will be against the instrument.The assessment is based on information available at the time of the investigation.No product was returned for investigation; therefore, it could not be determined if the product met specification based solely on the information provided by the customer.Complaints are monitored through tracking and trending.If a trend is detected, further investigation will be conducted.Adverse event terms: hypertension and toxicity (citrate).(b)(4).Device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
In an article written by kapadi et al., pediatr blood cancer 2015;62:1485-1488, an institutional review board study was performed on patients being treated for graft versus host disease (gvhd) using extracorporeal photopheresis (ecp).The study took place from september 2010 to may 2014.The article reported that seven treatments were terminated early secondary to patient hemodynamic instability, line occlusions, or alarms (the actual alarms were not specified in the article).The article stated that technical complications, including line occlusions requiring tissue plasminogen activator (tpa) and instrumental alarms, occurred 30 times during this study period.The article reported that there were two hypertensive episodes in patients undergoing ecp treatments during this study.The article also stated that there were 27 incidents where blood products were required and one incident of citrate toxicity.The article did not specify if these events occurred before or after drug administration or even what drug was used during the study.No other information regarding these patients was provided in the article.The instrument was not returned for investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Type of Device
CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
THERAKOS, INC
hampton NJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
THERAKOS, INC.
10 north high street
suite 300
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
megan vernak
po box 9001
53 frontage road
hampton, NJ 08827
MDR Report Key6503437
MDR Text Key73217327
Report Number2523595-2017-00081
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,litera
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/19/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Nurse
Device Model NumberNOT APPLICABLE
Device Catalogue NumberCELLEX
Device Lot NumberNOT APPLICABLE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/22/2017
Initial Date FDA Received04/19/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
-
-