The angiosculpt device separated in the patient.Additional intervention was required to remove from the patient, thus resulting in prolongation of the case.The cath lab report and angiogram were received for evaluation.After review of the case, it appears that there is no angiographic evidence of a catheter part/piece, being left in the patient.Patient information regarding relevant test or laboratory data is unknown.This information was not available from the facility.Foreign- (b)(6).The angiosculpt device was returned with only the distal half that was intact to a 0.014" guide wire.The proximal half of the catheter was not returned.Visual examination found an elevated scoring element with what appears to be plaque stuck at the distal section.Two scoring element rings were lifted and the distal bond was damaged with bare spots exposing the scoring element rings.The rx port was lacerated and the shaft was severely stretched and separated at the hypotube.During withdrawal, the angiosculpt device got stuck in the lesion.Based on the lab analysis, excessive exertion of force was applied which caused or contributed to the device separation.Per the ifu, retained device component is listed as a possible adverse effect of the procedure.
|
A 2.5 mm angiosculpt was used for a pre-dilatation in the lad.Upon removal, it got stuck in the proximal lad while pulling back into the guiding catheter.The shaft of the angiosculpt fractured after trying to remove it with force.A second wire and a trapping balloon were used to remove the broken part out of the patient.A stent was placed in the lad to complete the procedure.No patient injury or complication, however the patient was admitted 1 night for observation.
|