The deep gouging wear patterns found on the explanted set screws are consistent with the complaint description.These wear patterns have been replicated in bench top testing by imparting high impact forces on the rod which pushes the rod through the set screw-rod-pedicle screw interface and results in the deep gouging on the distal surface of the set screw.It was also found in bench top testing that once the set screw experiences these high axial slip forces, the axial load on the set screw holding the rod to the pedicle screw is significantly compromised.Once the axial load on the set screw is affected, it can result in the set screw dissociating from the pedicle screw.Based on review of the explanted product, the wear patterns indicate that the set screw at right s1 did not experience final tightening loads.If the set screw did not undergo final tightening, the full axial compression on the set screw-rod-right s1 screw would not have been realized.If the set screw was not applying the full axial load at right s1, it would be easier for the rod to slip, especially because the location of the failure is at the bottom of a construct ending in the sacral-iliac region where screws typically experience the highest loads because they are exposed to the full moment arm of the construct.Based on this assumption and the analysis of the explanted product, it appears that the axial slip failure at right s1 occurred first, which pulled the rod partially through left s1.As the construct was continually fatigued, the set screw at left s1 began to rotate out of the s1 pedicle screw resulting in the thru hole and spiral gouging wear patterns.
|