• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALPHATEC SPINE INC ARSENAL SPINAL FIXATION SYSTEM; PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALPHATEC SPINE INC ARSENAL SPINAL FIXATION SYSTEM; PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Device Problem Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/11/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
An evaluation is not possible at this time.The implant has not been returned nor has the identifying part and/or lot number been provided.It is unknown if revision surgery has taken place.Attempts to obtain information have been unsuccessful.Upon the receipt of additional information and/or the suspect implant a follow report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
Post-op x-rays taken (b)(6) 2017 showed the rods pulled out axially from both polyaxial screws at the s2.The separation occurred although the caps/set screws remain intact.The arsenal fixation system was originally implanted on (b)(6) 2017.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On 5/9/2017 - additional information provided by the sales rep.Revision surgery was conducted (b)(6) 2017 to remove and replace the entire arsenal fixation system.The explanted construct is currently being evaluated.A follow up report with results of the investigation will be submitted upon completion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The deep gouging wear patterns found on the explanted set screws are consistent with the complaint description.These wear patterns have been replicated in bench top testing by imparting high impact forces on the rod which pushes the rod through the set screw-rod-pedicle screw interface and results in the deep gouging on the distal surface of the set screw.It was also found in bench top testing that once the set screw experiences these high axial slip forces, the axial load on the set screw holding the rod to the pedicle screw is significantly compromised.Once the axial load on the set screw is affected, it can result in the set screw dissociating from the pedicle screw.Based on review of the explanted product, the wear patterns indicate that the set screw at right s1 did not experience final tightening loads.If the set screw did not undergo final tightening, the full axial compression on the set screw-rod-right s1 screw would not have been realized.If the set screw was not applying the full axial load at right s1, it would be easier for the rod to slip, especially because the location of the failure is at the bottom of a construct ending in the sacral-iliac region where screws typically experience the highest loads because they are exposed to the full moment arm of the construct.Based on this assumption and the analysis of the explanted product, it appears that the axial slip failure at right s1 occurred first, which pulled the rod partially through left s1.As the construct was continually fatigued, the set screw at left s1 began to rotate out of the s1 pedicle screw resulting in the thru hole and spiral gouging wear patterns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARSENAL SPINAL FIXATION SYSTEM
Type of Device
PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALPHATEC SPINE INC
5818 el camino real
carlsbad CA 92008
Manufacturer Contact
vernon trimble
5818 el camino real
carlsbad, CA 92008
7604946648
MDR Report Key6550039
MDR Text Key74741921
Report Number2027467-2017-00026
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K133221
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/12/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/01/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/12/2017
Initial Date FDA Received05/06/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
04/12/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/02/2017
07/18/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
-
-