• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SMTXSFT0204
Device Problems Bent (1059); Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/17/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the second smart coil¿s pusher assembly.The distal region of the pusher assembly was deformed.The embolization coil was intact with the pusher assembly and had offset coil winds and gaps near its proximal end.Conclusions: evaluation of the first smart coil revealed the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.Since the smart coil was reportedly removed from the procedure without detachment issues, this detachment was likely incidental and likely occurred after successful removal of the smart coil.Since the first smart coil was detached and the embolization coil was not returned for evaluation, the root cause of the resistance experienced when advancing the first smart coil could not be determined.Evaluation of the second smart coil revealed the embolization coil had offset coil winds and gaps near its proximal end.If the smart coil is forcefully advanced while the introducer sheath is not properly aligned inside the hub, resistance may be experienced, and damage such as this may occur.This damage likely contributed to the resistance when advancing the smart coil during functional analysis.Further evaluation revealed the distal regions of both pusher assembly were deformed.This damage may have occurred due to forceful advancement of the smart coil against resistance.The non-penumbra microcatheter mentioned in the complaint and the first smart coil¿s embolization coil were not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-00749.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the anterior communicating artery using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, while attempting to advance a smart coil through a non-penumbra microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance and was unable to advance the smart coil.Consequently, the smart coil pusher assembly became bent and therefore, it was removed.The physician then attempted to advance a new smart coil through the microcatheter; however, resistance was experienced again, the smart coil was unable to advance and the pusher assembly was bent.The smart coil was removed and the procedure was completed using the same microcatheter and additional smart coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key6576147
MDR Text Key75528372
Report Number3005168196-2017-00750
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548015286
UDI-Public00814548015286
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K160832
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/19/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date11/01/2021
Device Catalogue Number400SMTXSFT0204
Device Lot NumberF72604
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/11/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/19/2017
Initial Date FDA Received05/18/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/02/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-