• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310030
Device Problem Material Rupture (1546)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/25/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the burr catheter sheath ruptured.A 1.50 mm rotalink¿ plus was selected for use.During removal of the device, it was noted that the sheath of the rotablator ruptured.No patient complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned for evaluation.The advancer, burr, sheath, coil, and handshake connections were microscopically and visually examined.The advancer unit and burr unit were received attached together as a single unit.The advancer knob was received tightened in a backward position.There was blood in the sheath of the device.The sheath was separated/split 25.5cm distal of the strain relief.The ends of the sheath were jagged, twisted and damaged with suggests the separation was due to tensile overload.The sheath was also damaged/flattened 23.5cm ¿ 24cm distal of the strain relief.The damage is consistent with damaged caused by the hemostasis valve being over tightened.The annulus was also damaged, not rounded and flattened on one side.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the burr catheter sheath ruptured.A 1.50mm rotalink plus was selected for use.During removal of the device, it was noted that the sheath of the rotablator ruptured.No patient complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6578034
MDR Text Key75533231
Report Number2134265-2017-04762
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729228363
UDI-Public(01)08714729228363(17)20181231(10)20181945.
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/27/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2018
Device Model NumberH749236310030
Device Catalogue Number23631-003
Device Lot Number20181945
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/24/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/27/2017
Initial Date FDA Received05/19/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/23/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-