• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS LIPASE COLORIMETRIC ASSAY; LIPASE-ESTERASE, ENZYMATIC, PHOTOMETRIC, LIPASE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS LIPASE COLORIMETRIC ASSAY; LIPASE-ESTERASE, ENZYMATIC, PHOTOMETRIC, LIPASE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03029590322
Device Problem High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/29/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This event occurred in (b)(6).
 
Event Description
The customer received questionable lipc lipase colorimetric assay results for one patient sample.The customer used cobas 6000 c (501) module serial number (b)(4).The initial result was 578 ui/l with a data flag.The repeat result with an automatic dilution was 827 ui/l.With a manual 1:20 dilution, the result was 896 ui/l.The result of 827 ui/l was reported to the doctor who decided to send the patient to the hospital.There another sample was drawn and the lipase result on another cobas 6000 c (501) module was 63 ui/l.The hospital called the laboratory who repeated the first sample and the result was 854 ui/l.On (b)(6) 2017, the first sample was sent to the hospital with results of 565 ui/l with a data flag, 974 ui/l with a data flag, and 963 ui/l.There was no allegation of an adverse event.It was suspected there was contamination or a mis-identification of the first sample.Other assays were unaffected.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received for the complaint.The customer believes the high results to be correct.The customer did not believe that the suspect sample was mislabeled because all other parameters were reproducible.Contamination of the patient sample is not likely as the high results were confirmed several times.The second sample was drawn less than 24 hours after the first sample.Pancreatitis was excluded for the patient because other enzymes remained normal.No medication was given to the patient.As calibration and qc data was acceptable, a general reagent issue was not suspected.Interference in the sample was unlikely as the second sample from the patient had a result in the normal range.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A specific root cause could not be identified.Additional information for further investigation was requested but was not provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIPASE COLORIMETRIC ASSAY
Type of Device
LIPASE-ESTERASE, ENZYMATIC, PHOTOMETRIC, LIPASE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key6581117
MDR Text Key75612549
Report Number1823260-2017-01058
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CHI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K972250
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/18/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2017
Device Catalogue Number03029590322
Device Lot Number205954
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/02/2017
Initial Date FDA Received05/22/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
05/02/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/13/2017
08/18/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-