• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC; BENCHMARK XT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC; BENCHMARK XT Back to Search Results
Model Number 05265231001
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problems Misdiagnosis (2159); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/24/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's investigation into this issue is ongoing.The case states that the customer does not use the manufacturer's required package insert criteria for scoring conventions for the interpretation of pathway her2 (4b5) a detailed summary of the outcome of the investigation will be provided through the final report.
 
Event Description
Customer is transferring breast work (her2, er and pr) from xt to ultra.Approx 50 cases have been used, some in parallel with current cases, but mostly retrospectively.Six (6) cases have been found to be discordant between the xt and ultra (in each case, what was reported as a her2 1+ on the xt was a 2+ on the ultra).Subsequent ddish testing has shown 2 of these cases to be amplified.One case has already resulted in a change of treatment following mdt meeting on (b)(6) 2017.The impact on patient treatment for the other case is unknown at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer alleges discordant ven anti-her2/neu (4b5) rm pab-us export (05999570001) results between benchmark xt and benchmark ultra instruments.Discordant results were confirmed subsequent her2 dual ish testing.Based upon the information provided by the customer, there is no indication of any rtd product malfunction.There are potential contributing factors to discordant results: the customer does not use the package insert criteria for scoring conventions for the interpretation of pathway her2 (4b5), nor do they use the package insert recommended protocol for ven anti-her2/neu (4b5), which is likely to be a contributor to the darker staining observed on the slides stained on the customer¿s benchmark ultra.Tumor heterogeneity/ serial sections.Her2 amplification ratios by fluorescence in situ hybridization and correlation with immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 6556 breast cancer tissues by marilyn a.Owens, bruce c.Horten, moacyr m.Da silva provides evidence indicating that tumors scoring 1+ by her2 ihc testing may produce amplified gene test results.The package insert for ven anti-her2/neu (4b5) also indicates that tumors scoring 1+ by ven anti-her2/neu (4b5) may produce amplified gene test results.Although requested, no additional information about deterioration of the patients¿ health has been provided.The customer continues to use the rtd assay and insturments and has provided the results of their external quality assessment (ukneqas) showing proficiency and passing results.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
BENCHMARK XT
Manufacturer (Section D)
VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
1910 e innovation park dr
tucson AZ 85755 1962
MDR Report Key6590004
MDR Text Key75918374
Report Number2028492-2017-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MYA
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,user facility
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/22/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other Health Care Professional
Device Model Number05265231001
Device Catalogue Number750-700
Other Device ID NumberUDI 04015630981069
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/24/2017
Initial Date FDA Received05/24/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/24/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/22/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-