• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL); PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL); PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number TICM120V4
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Endophthalmitis (1835); Intraocular Infection (1933); Pain (1994); Blurred Vision (2137); Loss of Vision (2139); Visual Disturbances (2140); Vitrectomy (2643); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 03/14/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device history record (dhr) review: based on the results of the investigation, it has been determined that nothing in the manufacturing of the lens could have caused the reported event.Claim # (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The reporter indicated that the surgeon implanted a 12.0mm ticm120v4, implantable collamer lens, into the patient's right eye (od) on (b)(6) 2013.Patient states surgery was painful and the surgeon caused "surgical trauma" which led to infection and blurred vision.On (b)(6) 2013 patient's vision was "6/6" but by the next day patient was experiencing pain, "huge flashes," and yellowness in vision.On (b)(6) 2013 patient was diagnosed with pvd (posterior vitreous detachment).Patient states he was told he was having "ac reaction" and was given "medicinal" drops.On (b)(6) 2013 the patient was diagnosed with an infection in the eye.Patient was treated with antibiotic and anti-fungal medication.Both times patient tested negative for infection.On (b)(6) 2013 the lens was explanted.Lens was not sent to staar (manufacturer) for evaluation but to an alternate lab, in which one out of three pieces tested positive for fungal elements.Patient had several more surgeries, including vitrectomies, and several more medicinal treatments.Patient states that after the 1st implant (reference mdr 2023826-2017-00902) he had developed endophthalmitis and was left uninformed and untreated by his physician.Currently, patient has no vision in the right (od) eye.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device history record (dhr) review: based on the results of the investigation, it has been determined that nothing in the manufacturing of the lens could have caused the reported event.Claim # (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL)
Type of Device
PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
hauptstrasse 104
nidau, 2560
SZ  2560
Manufacturer (Section G)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
hauptstrasse 104
nidau, 2560
SZ   2560
Manufacturer Contact
michelle andres
1911 walker avenue
monrovia, CA 91016
6263037902
MDR Report Key6606098
MDR Text Key76479140
Report Number2023826-2017-00903
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MTA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
N/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/05/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date08/31/2014
Device Model NumberTICM120V4
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/05/2017
Initial Date FDA Received06/01/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/11/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/12/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention; Disability;
Patient Age23 YR
-
-