Model Number HG-18-90-32 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Insert (1316); Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/08/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Other relevant device(s) are: ha-18-114 sn (b)(4), expiration date: 2019-02-28, (b)(4).Device evaluation summary: the reported complaint could not be confirmed since the event took place in-vivo and since the guide was manually cut during the procedure.Due to the damaged incurred during cutting of the guide, the root cause of the event could not be conclusively determined.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
A heli-fx applier was used as prophylactic with an endurant stent graft system in a patient for the endovascular treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.It was reported that the patient¿s infrarenal neck is growing and the physician decided to prophylactically secure the stent graft to prevent further growth of the infrarenal neck, and prevent a type i endoleak.The guide and applier were prepared intended.The intention was to place the first endoanchor.The anchor was partially deployed as (step one) and it was determined that this was the desired position.The physician wanted to complete the deployment of the endoanchor as (step two), however, the applier did not work and the blue light was lighting.The endoanchor was able to be removed by twisting the applier counter clockwise.Another applier was then used to attempt to complete the case.After two anchors were placed and the guide was in a 90-degree angle to place another endoanchor, extreme resistance was felt.The applier had been inserted to the tip of the guide; however, it was impossible to advance or withdraw the applier.The whole system was removed from the patient.The applier was stuck in the guide.It was possible to use the applier, but it was impossible to advance or withdraw the applier.A third applier was not available the decision was made to cut open the tip of the guide and removed the applier.The applier was checked and it was not damaged.Another guide was used to complete the procedure as planned.No abnormal use and handling of the device was observed.The physician stated the cause of the event is device related.No clinical sequelae were reported and the patient is fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|