• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC SUNNYVALE/APTUS ENDOSYSTEMS ENDO ANCHOR SYSTEM - HELI-FX TAA; ENDOVASCULAR SUTURING SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC SUNNYVALE/APTUS ENDOSYSTEMS ENDO ANCHOR SYSTEM - HELI-FX TAA; ENDOVASCULAR SUTURING SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number HG-18-90-32
Device Problems Difficult to Insert (1316); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/08/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other relevant device(s) are: ha-18-114 sn (b)(4), expiration date: 2019-02-28, (b)(4).Device evaluation summary: the reported complaint could not be confirmed since the event took place in-vivo and since the guide was manually cut during the procedure.Due to the damaged incurred during cutting of the guide, the root cause of the event could not be conclusively determined.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
A heli-fx applier was used as prophylactic with an endurant stent graft system in a patient for the endovascular treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.It was reported that the patient¿s infrarenal neck is growing and the physician decided to prophylactically secure the stent graft to prevent further growth of the infrarenal neck, and prevent a type i endoleak.The guide and applier were prepared intended.The intention was to place the first endoanchor.The anchor was partially deployed as (step one) and it was determined that this was the desired position.The physician wanted to complete the deployment of the endoanchor as (step two), however, the applier did not work and the blue light was lighting.The endoanchor was able to be removed by twisting the applier counter clockwise.Another applier was then used to attempt to complete the case.After two anchors were placed and the guide was in a 90-degree angle to place another endoanchor, extreme resistance was felt.The applier had been inserted to the tip of the guide; however, it was impossible to advance or withdraw the applier.The whole system was removed from the patient.The applier was stuck in the guide.It was possible to use the applier, but it was impossible to advance or withdraw the applier.A third applier was not available the decision was made to cut open the tip of the guide and removed the applier.The applier was checked and it was not damaged.Another guide was used to complete the procedure as planned.No abnormal use and handling of the device was observed.The physician stated the cause of the event is device related.No clinical sequelae were reported and the patient is fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDO ANCHOR SYSTEM - HELI-FX TAA
Type of Device
ENDOVASCULAR SUTURING SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC SUNNYVALE/APTUS ENDOSYSTEMS
271 gibraltar drive
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC SUNNYVALE/APTUS ENDOSYSTEMS
271 gibraltar drive
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway, CA 
7075661361
MDR Report Key6606293
MDR Text Key76517226
Report Number2953200-2017-00897
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
K140036
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/09/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2019
Device Model NumberHG-18-90-32
Device Catalogue NumberHG-18-90-32
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/24/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/08/2017
Initial Date FDA Received06/01/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/08/2017
11/22/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/04/2017
12/09/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/06/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
Patient Weight91
-
-