An osseotite tapered certain prevail implant (xiitp6513) was returned.Visual inspection of the as received products identified general signs of usage around the external threads and the internal hex.The complaint does not allege a failure that can be tested.Visual comparison of drawing 2015041139 rev c was consistent with the design of the implant and did not identify any manufacturing deviation.Review of the implant dhr did not provide any indication of a manufacturing deviation or material deficiencies that would contribute to the reported event.Document type(s) reviewed: biomet 3i dental implant ifu (p-iis086gi rev.F 11/2015).Information identified: potential adverse events: potential adverse events associated with the use of dental implants may include: failure to integrate, loss of integration, dehiscence requiring bone grafting, perforation of the maxillary sinus, inferior border, lingual plate, labial plate, inferior alveolar canal, or gingiva, infection as reported by abscess, fistula, suppuration, inflammation, or radiolucency, persistent pain, numbness, paresthesia, hyperplasia, excessive bone loss requiring intervention, implant breakage or fracture, systemic infection, nerve injury, ingestion, aspiration and/or swallowing.The complaint could not be verified, as there were no manufacturing deviations identified with the implant that could cause or contribute to the reported event.The exact details of the device usage are unknown.The conditions under which the implant was subjected in the patient¿s mouth are unknown.No radiographs or photographs of the implant site were provided.Therefore, based on the information provided, a definitive cause originating from the anatomical and/or use conditions cannot be determined.(b)(4).
|