• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN (IRVINE) NV MICROCATHETER; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN (IRVINE) NV MICROCATHETER; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The catheter was not returned for analysis.Attempts have been made to obtain additional information, however our attempts have been unsuccessful.A marathon or an ultraflow catheter was used in this case, however, it unknown which of these two catheters encountered this event.The report of catheter entrapment/difficult removal could not be confirmed, and the event cause could not be determined.It is possible that excessive liquid embolic reflux may have contributed to the reported issue.Per our instructions for use (ifu): do not allow more than 1 cm of the liquid embolic to reflux back over catheter tip.Angioarchitecture, vasospasm, excessive liquid embolic reflux, or prolonged injection time may result in difficult catheter removal and potential entrapment.Difficult catheter removal or catheter entrapment may be caused by one or more of the following factors: long catheterization time; angio-architecture (very distal arteriovenous malformation fed by afferent, lengthened, small, or tortuous pedicles); vasospasm; reflux; injection time.To reduce the risk of catheter entrapment, carefully select catheter placement and manage reflux to minimize the factors listed above.Liquid embolic reflux along the distal tip of the micro catheter: apart from the risk of ischemic complications due to unintended embolization, significant reflux may result in entrapment of the micro catheter causing difficult removal.The amount of reflux that can be accepted must always be compared to the angio-architecture of the malformation to minimize risk of unintended embolization or difficult catheter removal.In general, minimize the reflux to less than 1 cm along the distal tip of the micro catheter.All other factors may affect this limit.All products are 100% inspected for damages and irregularities during manufacture.Linked event: 2029214-2017-00819, 2029214-2017-00820, 2029214-2017-00821.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Citation: embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (onyx)¿ v.Panagiotopoulos, e.Gizewski, s.Asgari.Ajnr am j neuroradiol.2009 jan;30(1):99-106.Doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1314.Epub 2008 oct 8.Medtronic received the following reports: there was one case where a microballoon was used for preventing coil migration into the venous side of a fistulous part of an avm, the device stuck and could not be removed.The patient was symptomatic post intervention.There was another trapped microcatheter in the posterior circulation, which did not add clinical morbidity to our cohort.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NV MICROCATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN (IRVINE)
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN (IRVINE)
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
tricha miles
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
9492753836
MDR Report Key6656736
MDR Text Key78157103
Report Number2029214-2017-00820
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/26/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/26/2017
Initial Date FDA Received06/21/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Disability;
-
-