• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number NOT APPLICABLE
Device Problems Leak/Splash (1354); Split (2537); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem Blood Loss (2597)
Event Date 05/24/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The system was used for treatment.This case is reportable as a mdr due to the reportable malfunction drive tube leak/break.Since this reportable malfunction is only associated with the kit, this mdr will only be against the kit.A batch record review for kit lot f302 was conducted.There were no non-conformances related to the complaint.This lot met all release requirements.A review of f302 for the reported issue shows no trends.Trends were reviewed for complaint categories, drive tube leak/break, alarm #7: blood leak (centrifuge chamber), and alarm #1: air detected.No trends were detected for these complaint categories.This assessment is based on the information available at the time of the investigation.At the time of this report, the analysis of the customer provided photographs is still in progress.A supplemental report will be filed when the analysis is complete.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Customer called to report a drive tube leak during the procedure.Customer stated at the time of the leak, the instrument was in a paused state due to an air detected alarm that was reset.Approximately 700 ml whole blood was processed when the leak occurred and the customer received an alarm #7 blood leak (centrifuge chamber).The customer aborted the procedure and did not return blood to the patient.Customer stated upon inspection of the centrifuge chamber a large slit was observed down the length of the drive tube.Customer stated the centrifuge bowl, drive tube, upper and lower drive tube bearings remained installed and intact.Customer stated they did not identify any damaged parts or components within the centrifuge chamber.Customer stated the patient was stable and would not require any medical intervention or blood transfusion.Customer stated they will not be returning product; however, has returned photographs for investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A photo analysis was conducted for this complaint.A review of the photos confirmed the leak.Further examination of the photos verified a slit along the drive tube that is most likely the cause of the leak.The root cause of the slit along the drive tube could not be determined based on the information provided.This investigation is now complete.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Type of Device
CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
THERAKOS
hampton NJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
THERAKOS, INC.
10 north high street
suite 300
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
megan vernak
53 frontage road
p.o. box 9001
hampton, NJ 08827
MDR Report Key6658317
MDR Text Key78259673
Report Number2523595-2017-00103
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNR
UDI-Device Identifier20705030200003
UDI-Public(01)20705030200003(10)F302(17)190101
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/10/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Nurse
Device Expiration Date01/01/2019
Device Model NumberNOT APPLICABLE
Device Catalogue NumberCLXUSA
Device Lot NumberF302
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/24/2017
Initial Date FDA Received06/21/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/13/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/10/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/05/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age74 YR
Patient Weight80
-
-