• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Unintended Collision (1429); Unable to Obtain Readings (1516); Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944)
Patient Problem Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099)
Event Date 05/26/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis results were not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when analysis is completed.
 
Event Description
Information was received from the manufacturer¿s representative regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported the patient had multiple falls off their horse so both the patient and the physician decided to do a lead revision to help with their symptoms.No known diagnostic testing was performed.However, impedance testing prior to the surgical case showed no open or short circuits.During the case, the physician removed the ins and wrapped it in sterile water-soaked ¿raytec¿ for later use after the lead revision had occurred.When the physician went to connect the lead to the ins they noticed blood/fluid in the hub of the generator.The physician connected the lead and intra-operative impedances showed 2 of the electrode combinations displayed ¿?¿.The physician took the lead out, cleaned it, and retested impedances with the same result.The physician decided to use a new ins.Though the surgical case was for lead replacement/revision only the ins ended up being replaced due to the blood in the hub of the ins.The issue was reported as resolved at the time of report.The patient status was noted as ¿alive ¿ no injury¿.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) model 3058, (b)(4) showed no significant anomalies.Foreign material was observed in the ins connector port.As a result, an impedance test was performed (with a known good lead) in 0.9% saline solution and good impedances were observed using a clinician programmer.The device passed functional testing and lab functional testing determined there was good stable output on all electrical pairs as received.It was also determined the telemetry was acceptable.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6658485
MDR Text Key78125167
Report Number3004209178-2017-13473
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/26/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2016
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/01/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/26/2017
Initial Date FDA Received06/21/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/21/2017
07/21/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/26/2017
10/05/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/28/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
-
-