• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES ELMIRA HELIX BLADE 90MM; APPLIANCE, FIXATION DEVICE, PROXIMAL FEMUR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES ELMIRA HELIX BLADE 90MM; APPLIANCE, FIXATION DEVICE, PROXIMAL FEMUR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 282.237
Device Problem Failure to Align (2522)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/14/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional product code: ktt.Due to intra-operative issues, the device was not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).Part 282.237, lot 9882591: release to warehouse date: august 24, 2015.Manufacturing site: (b)(6).A review of the device history record (dhr) revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of helix blade 90mm product was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications with no non-conformance noted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2017, an (b)(6)-year-old female patient, who had a hip fracture, was operated with dynamic hip screw system (dhss) equipment.As the doctor tried to insert the helix blade, it was identified that the device did not fit correctly to the plate.Due to this, the blade got stuck in the plate.The doctor proceeded with a clamp to remove the helix blade.The surgery was not prolonged and the patient status is good.Concomitant parts: plate (part/lot unknown, quantity 1).This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information provided: as the doctor tried to insert the reported helix blade, it was identified that the device did not fit correctly to the plate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: following part was returned under (b)(4); lcp dhhs helixblade l90 sst (p/n 282.237, lot #s 9882591) - qty.1.Customer quality (cq) engineering investigation: the complaint condition could not be replicated at customer quality (cq) due to unavailability of lcp dhhs plate at the cq location.Visual inspection, device history record (dhr) review and drawing review were performed as part of this investigation.Visual inspection the balance of the returned helix blade is in good condition with minimal signs of superficial wear.The distal end of the device shows scratches which were probably made during efforts to separate the helix blade from the plate using clamp.No signs of deformities were observed on the blade that would affect it¿s functionality.Dhr review for part # 282.237 lot # 9882591.Release to warehouse date: 24 august 2015.Manufacturing site: (b)(4).Dhr record review: a review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.A review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications with no non-conformance noted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Helix screw drawing was reviewed during this investigation.Following device features were measured which were found to be within specification.No design related issues were identified that would contribute to the complaint issue.Distal tip side-side width measured at 7.85mm (spec: 7.9mm +0/-0.05).Distal tip diameter measured at 7.10mm (spec: 7.15 mm +0/-0.05).Major flute axis diameter (proximal end) measured at 12.64mm (spec: 12.5mm +0.2/-0).Hence the complaint is unconfirmed as the concomitant dhhs plate was not returned and no issue with the returned helix screw was observed.Root cause: the returned part was determined to be suitable for the intended use when employed and maintained as recommended.Per the dhhs system technique guide, the helix blade is implanted in the bone first and then the plate is installed from the distal end of the helix blade.It may be possible that the surgical technique was not followed correctly based on the complaint description.On the other hand, the technique guide provides specific instruction to aid proper alignment of the plate and the helix blade.It recommends to use lcp dhhs key alignment shaft.Firstly the flats on the alignment shaft should be aligned with flats on the internal key on the sideplate.Later, the alignment of the hexagonal tip on the alignment shaft that meets with the end of the helix blade should be followed correctly.This ensures that the internal sideplate key and the helix blade shaft are properly aligned.Technique tip mentions that if the plate does not slide easily into the reamed cavity, gentle moving the alignment shaft up and down can assist the placement.Dhs/dcs impactor may also be used for further assistance.It is possible that one of the above steps critical for device alignment and assembly were not followed correctly which led to the devices being stuck together.The exact root cause could not be determined.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HELIX BLADE 90MM
Type of Device
APPLIANCE, FIXATION DEVICE, PROXIMAL FEMUR
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES ELMIRA
35 airport road
horseheads NY 14845
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES ELMIRA
35 airport road
horseheads NY 14845
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6710180
MDR Text Key80145390
Report Number3003506883-2017-10132
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDO
UDI-Device Identifier07611819736337
UDI-Public(01)07611819736337(10)9882591
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K042895
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number282.237
Device Lot Number9882591
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/07/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/15/2017
Initial Date FDA Received07/13/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/04/2017
08/08/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/04/2017
08/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/24/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age80 YR
-
-