(b)(4).A visual examination of the returned capio¿ slim revealed several damages in the distal section, the head halves come apart however there is evidence that the riveting process was done correctly.Also, the cage returned broke in two sections, this failures is evidence of excess of force applied to the tip.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.The investigation concluded that this complaint is associated with a product that meets the design and manufacture specifications but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance of the device was limited.The most probable root cause classification is operational context.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a capio slim was used during a sacrospinous ligament fixation procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the head of the capio slim device split in half.The needle detached from the suture and was left inside the patient.The procedure was completed with another capio slim.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|