• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310020
Device Problem Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/28/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr.: returned product consisted of the rotalink device.The advancer knob and handshake were microscopically and visually inspected.The handshake connections were visually examined.The sheath of the burr catheter was separated 113cm from the distal end of the sheath.The separated ends were jagged which indicates the separation may have been due to tesile forces applied.Functional testing was performed by connecting the advancer to the rotablator control console system.The device was not able to get any speed and the stall light came on.The advancer was dismantled and the ultem was found to be melted and the turbine was corroded.Inspection of the remainder of the device revealed no other damage or irregularities.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical/procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id# 2134265-2017-07135.It was reported that the sheath was torn.The target lesion was located in the left anterior descending (lad) artery.A 1.25mm rotalink¿ plus was advanced to perform ablation.The device was able to do two passes; however, on the third pass, the device kept stalling.The physician checked all the connections, including the drip and everything was fine.The device was removed from the patient's body and it was noted that the metal sheath that covers the spring on the rotablator was torn.Ablation was completed with a 1.5mm rotalink¿ plus.Following ablation, a 3.50x32mm promus premier¿ drug-eluting stent was advanced with a non-bsc guide extension catheter in place and two guide wires across the lesion.However, the device could not pass through the non-bsc guide extension catheter.The device was removed from the patient's body and the stent was noted to be shredded up.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6722663
MDR Text Key80420217
Report Number2134265-2017-07127
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729316411
UDI-Public(01)08714729316411(17)20190331(10)20473067
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2019
Device Model NumberH749236310020
Device Catalogue Number23631-002
Device Lot Number20473067
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/06/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/28/2017
Initial Date FDA Received07/18/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/12/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age59 YR
-
-