The customer previously reported that this event may have resulted in a possible increased hospital stay., but no specific details were provided.As of the date of this report, no further information was received.(b)(4).Investigation: a review of documentation, drawings, complaint history, device history record, and quality control data was conducted during the investigation.Complaint device evaluation was not performed since no product or imaging was returned to assist with this investigation.The manufacturing documents in place at the time of manufacture were reviewed and it was found that the device aspect in question was visually inspected by quality control.A review of the device history record for the lot in question confirmed no non-conformance's through manufacturing related to the failure mode.A search of our complaint records indicates that this is the only complaint on the lot numbers at the time of investigation.Similar failures of this type are documented in the product risk assessment.The document also assesses the severity associated with each failure mode, causes and effects of the failure, current risk controls in place, and the detection level of a particular failure.Current risk controls for the described failure mode include the adaptor components are designed with proper dimensions/tolerances and appropriate notes for applying adhesive, inspection of device functionality including a leak test, and final inspection where glue joint is twisted and verified to be adequate prior to shipping.Without visual, dimensional, or functional testing of the involved components a definitive root cause cannot be established or reported at this time a quality engineering risk assessment was performed to address this failure mode.No further action is required.We will notify the appropriate personnel and continue to monitor for similar complaints.
|