• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number NTO APPLICABLE
Device Problems Material Fragmentation (1261); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/26/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The system was used for treatment.This case is reportable as a mdr due to the reportable malfunction centrifuge bowl leak/break.Since this reportable malfunction is only associated with the kit, this mdr will only be against the kit.A batch record review for kit lot e348 was conducted.There were no non-conformances related to the complaint.This lot met all release requirements.A review of e348 for the reported issue shows no trends.Trends were reviewed for complaint categories centrifuge bowl leak/break, alarm #17: return pressure.No trends were detected for each complaint category.This assessment is based on the information available at the time of the investigation.At the time of this report, the analysis of the returned kit and customer photos are still in progress.A supplemental report will be filed when the analysis is complete.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Customer has called in to report a centrifuge bowl break in the very last moments of elutriation during the buffy coat collection.The customer stated that the only alarms received earlier on in the procedure was an alarm #17: return pressure and it was resolvable.Customer said the centrifuge bowl was found to be broken just as the hematocrit sensor graph reached 24%.The customer had hit the stop button and turned the instrument off and they do not remember hearing an alarm while doing so.The customer confirmed that they aborted the treatment, and did not return any blood or fluids to the patient.Customer said the patient was stable and would not require any medical intervention, blood transfusion, or fluid bolus.It was stated that the centrifuge bowl was "shattered," the base of the centrifuge bowl was still connected to the bowl holder.Customer said it appeared that the centrifuge bowl came apart at the very bottom plastic weld of the outer clear plastic bowl.Customer also mentioned the leak detector strip was damaged.The customer stated the bottom drive tube bearing remained installed in the retainer clip, but the upper drive tube bearing had dislodged from the upper bearing retainer clip.The customer stated that they will be returning the kit and providing customer photos.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint kit, smartcard and customer provided photographs were returned for analysis.Review of the smartcard determined that prime was completed without incident and verified the occurrence of the return pressure alarm early on during the treatment.Further review of the smartcard determined that buffy coat collection had begun after 1465 ml of whole blood was processed and a blood leak alarm in the centrifuge occurred shortly afterwards which verifies the customer's description of events.Evaluation of the returned kit components confirmed that the welded portion of the outer centrifuge bowl was intact.In addition, all four of the centrifuge bowl locating tabs are present and undamaged indicating the base was retained in the instrument's centrifuge bowl holder during the treatment.No issues or defects with the drive tube or the drive tube components were identified.The investigation was unable to determine a definitive root cause for the reported centrifuge bowl break.No manufacturing related defects were confirmed during the evaluation.Investigation complete.Mc: (b)(4).A.B: (b)(6) 2017.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Type of Device
CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
THERAKOS
bedminster NJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
THERAKOS, INC
10 north high street
suite 300
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
megan vernak
1425 us route 206
bedminster, NJ 07921
MDR Report Key6743348
MDR Text Key81433038
Report Number2523595-2017-00134
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNR
UDI-Device Identifier20705030200003
UDI-Public(01)20705030200003(10)E348(17)180901
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Nurse
Device Expiration Date09/01/2018
Device Model NumberNTO APPLICABLE
Device Catalogue NumberCLXUSA
Device Lot NumberE348
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/05/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/26/2017
Initial Date FDA Received07/26/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/26/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/24/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/07/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age37 YR
Patient Weight112
-
-