• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. ANSPACH EMAX 2 PLUS BURR MOTOR; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. ANSPACH EMAX 2 PLUS BURR MOTOR; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 110940
Device Problems Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/18/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
While cutting bone the anspach motor was cutting in and out, i would have to reset cutter and eventually used the foot pedal.Then when dr.(b)(6) was burring the femur, the anspach started smoking and we had to switch motors.Case type pka; surgical delay of 10 minutes.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: anspach emax 2 plus burr motor; while cutting bone the anspach motor was cutting in and out, i would have to reset cutter and eventually used the foot pedal.Then when dr.(b)(6) was burring the femur, the anspach started smoking.Method & results: device evaluation and results: device evaluation was performed and the anspach emax 2 plus burr motor event was confirmed.Device history review: not performed as the anspach emax 2 plus burr motor is an oem product.Complaint history review: based on the device identification, the catsweb and trackwise complaint databases were reviewed from 2011 to present for similar reported events regarding anspach emax 2 plus burr motor; while cutting bone the anspach motor was cutting in and out, i would have to reset cutter and eventually used the foot pedal.Then when dr.(b)(6) was burring the femur, the anspach started smoking failure of p/n: 110940, s/n: (b)(4).There have been no other similar events for the referenced serial number.Conclusions: the anspach emax 2 plus burr motor is an oem device.Upon receipt, the anspach emax 2 plus burr motor was bench evaluated by (b)(6) (engineer, r&d robotics) and the reported event was confirmed.Corrective action/preventive action: as the event did not involve a manufacturing related product problem indicating a non-conformity, adverse trend, or unanticipated hazard, no corrective action is required at this time.
 
Event Description
While cutting bone the anspach motor was cutting in and out, i would have to reset cutter and eventually used the foot pedal.Then when dr.(b)(6) was burring the femur, the anspach started smoking and we had to switch motors.Case type pka; surgical delay of 10 minutes.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANSPACH EMAX 2 PLUS BURR MOTOR
Type of Device
STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
bethany hinson
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale, FL 33317
9546280700
MDR Report Key6745565
MDR Text Key81138181
Report Number3005985723-2017-00342
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112507
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number110940
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/18/2017
Initial Date FDA Received07/26/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/25/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/23/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-