• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. FOUNDATION HIP; FMP HEMISPHERICAL SHELLS W/SCREW HOLES, 56MM, W/P2 COATING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. FOUNDATION HIP; FMP HEMISPHERICAL SHELLS W/SCREW HOLES, 56MM, W/P2 COATING Back to Search Results
Model Number 400-03-401
Device Problem Device Slipped (1584)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 07/06/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Revision surgery: a total hip done two years ago the cup came loose and the surgeon used a liner and cup from a different company.The surgeon used a djo head and sleeve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery was loosening of the acetabular cup.The previous surgery and the revision detailed in this investigation occurred 2 years apart.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the implant device history records (dhr) shows that the reported component used in the previous surgery met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmrs) associated with the product that may have contributed to the event.The device was within its expiration date at the time of use during the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are in need of review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to the loosening.There were no findings during this investigation that indicate that the reported device was the source or had a direct connection with the loosening.There are many factors that may contribute to the event that are outside the control of djo surgical are loose joints from inadequate soft tissue support, patient bone deterioration, patient activities or trauma.No additional information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities that may have contributed to the event and hence a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this revision surgery was loosening of the acetabular cup.The previous surgery and the revision detailed in this investigation occurred 2 years apart.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the implant device history records (dhr) shows that the reported component used in the previous surgery met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmrs) associated with the product that may have contributed to the event.The device was within its expiration date at the time of use during the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are in need of review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to the loosening.There were no findings during this investigation that indicate that the reported device was the source or had a direct connection with the loosening.There are many factors that may contribute to the event that are outside the control of djo surgical are loose joints from inadequate soft tissue support, patient bone deterioration, patient activities or trauma.No additional information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities that may have contributed to the event and hence a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FOUNDATION HIP
Type of Device
FMP HEMISPHERICAL SHELLS W/SCREW HOLES, 56MM, W/P2 COATING
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd.
austin TX 78758 5445
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd.
austin TX 78758 5445
Manufacturer Contact
teffany hutto
9800 metric blvd.
austin, TX 78758-5445
MDR Report Key6764647
MDR Text Key81739892
Report Number1644408-2017-00672
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPH
UDI-Device Identifier00888912076166
UDI-Public(01)00888912076166
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K974093
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2021
Device Model Number400-03-401
Device Catalogue Number430-98-056
Device Lot Number591G1088
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/06/2017
Initial Date FDA Received08/03/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/06/2017
10/21/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/05/2017
10/23/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/27/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
-
-