• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® ACUSEAL VASCULAR GRAFT; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® ACUSEAL VASCULAR GRAFT; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ECH060040A
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 07/18/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Review of device manufacturing record history confirmed device met pre-release specifications.Still images were received and are still being evaluated.The explanted specimen is expected to be returned for evaluation.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2016, gore® acuseal vascular graft was implanted for arteriovenous access in a patient with end stage renal disease.The acuseal vascular graft was implanted from the femoral artery to femoral vein.As reported, the physician used an 8mm tunneler (unknown manufacturer) to create a tissue tunnel.The acuseal vascular graft was then pulled through the tissue track.Graft declotting procedures were done on multiple dates: (b)(6) 2017.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient's treatment record indicates a 7fr french argon cleaner thrombectomy device was used for mechanical thrombectomy.A 7mm diameter balloon was also used to angioplasty the stenosed areas of venous anastomosis and segments of the patient's fistula.Result was a successful thrombolysis of the acuseal vascular graft.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient returned for exploratory surgery and revision of the existing graft.During the procedure, the physician noted a thin strip of what may be the graft's inner lining, that had been dissected from the lumen of the graft.Using forceps, the physician pulled the strip out.At this time, the acuseal vascular graft was excised and a new gore® acuseal vascular graft was implanted.The patient was reported to be doing well following the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Imaging evaluation summary states the images provided do not allow for evaluation in elation to the reported event.The explanted specimen was not returned for evaluation.The user facility elected to retain the specimen.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Event date was corrected from (b)(6) 2017 to (b)(6) 2017, which is the reportable event date.Date of this report was corrected from 07/18/2017 to 07/25/2017, which is the date the event was reported to gore.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device fragments were returned to w.L.Gore & associates for investigation.Submitted fixed were two gore® vascular graft fragments (vgf-1 & vgf-2) and three fragments of synthetic material (sf-1, sf-2, & sf-3).The lumina of the fragments were widely patent.Plaques of tan-brown tissue was present in the lumina of vgf-1 and vgf-2.The luminal surfaces of sf-1, sf-2, and sf-3 were grossly devoid of tissue.The abluminal surfaces of vgf-1 and vgf-2 were covered in firmly adherent yellow-brown tissue.The abluminal surfaces of sf-1, sf-2, and sf-3 were grossly devoid of tissue.Histopathological examination of samples collected from vgf-2 and sf-1 (sections a & b) was performed.Analysis showed connective tissue within the basetube perforation sites (needle punctures, presumptive) extended as mature vascular tissue into the basetube lumen.This is consistent with a separation of the silicone and cbas luminal surface from the basetube in that region a minimum of several weeks prior to explant.The tissue response to the device material was normal for a long term explant.The fragments were subjected to an enzymatic digestion process to remove biologic debris.Following digestion the fragments were examined for material disruptions with the aid of a stereomicroscope.Sf-3 was then lengthwise opened to visualize the lumen.The lumen of sf-3 was examined by stereoscopic magnification and scanning electron microscopy (sem).No other manipulation of the fragments was performed.Identified findings were not associated with handling or manufacturing process at wl gore and associates.The material findings identified are consistent with use of surgical instruments and cannulation of a gore® acuseal vascular graft.The degree of manipulation by surgical instruments, likely at the time of explant, prevents the ability to identify evidence of in vivo delamination/material separation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® ACUSEAL VASCULAR GRAFT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL WEST B/P
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff AZ 86004
Manufacturer Contact
genevieve begay
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key6769373
MDR Text Key81899229
Report Number2017233-2017-00404
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K130215
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/22/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2019
Device Catalogue NumberECH060040A
Device Lot Number5237394PP020
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/04/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/16/2017
12/04/2017
12/22/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/31/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age38 YR
-
-